BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

3 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Dec 16, 2009· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Investigation finds that RCMP handled polling appropriately - December 16, 2009

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canada Firearms Program (CFP)

This investigation examined a complaint regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police's (RCMP) use and disclosure of personal information from the Canadian Firearms Program (CFP) database to a public opinion research firm, EKOS Research Associates Inc. The RCMP contracted EKOS to conduct a survey of firearms licensees to improve program administration and service delivery. The investigation reviewed the contract, security measures, and the survey process.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Investigation finds that RCMP handled polling appropriately - December 16, 2009

Dec 16, 2009
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation examined a complaint regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted Police's (RCMP) use and disclosure of personal information from the Canadian Firearms Program (CFP) database to a public opinion research firm, EKOS Research Associates Inc. The RCMP contracted EKOS to conduct a survey of firearms licensees to improve program administration and service delivery. The investigation reviewed the contract, security measures, and the survey process.

Key Issues
  • Appropriateness of using personal information for a client-satisfaction survey.
  • Compliance with contractual confidentiality and security provisions when disclosing information to a third-party contractor.
  • Whether the use of information for the survey was consistent with the purpose for which it was originally collected.
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Oct 6, 2009· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

No proof Human Rights Commission accessed woman's Internet connection

Canadian Human Rights Commission

A woman complained that the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) improperly collected and used her personal information by accessing her wireless Internet connection to post messages to a website during an investigation. The Office found no evidence that the CHRC accessed the complainant's connection or collected any of her personal information. Technological experts suggested the association of the complainant's IP address to the CHRC was likely a mismatch by a third party.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

No proof Human Rights Commission accessed woman's Internet connection

Oct 6, 2009
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

A woman complained that the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) improperly collected and used her personal information by accessing her wireless Internet connection to post messages to a website during an investigation. The Office found no evidence that the CHRC accessed the complainant's connection or collected any of her personal information. Technological experts suggested the association of the complainant's IP address to the CHRC was likely a mismatch by a third party.

Key Issues
  • Whether the CHRC improperly collected and used the complainant's personal information by accessing her Internet connection.
  • Whether an IP address constitutes personal information.
  • Evidence of unauthorized access to personal information.
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Jan 29, 2009· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Investigation finds no evidence that Canadian Human Rights Commission accessed individual's Internet connection

Canadian Human Rights Commission

An individual complained that the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) improperly collected and used her personal information, alleging the CHRC accessed her wireless internet connection to post messages on a website. The investigation examined whether the CHRC contravened sections 4 to 8 of the Privacy Act. Ultimately, the OPC found no evidence that the CHRC collected or used the complainant's personal information, concluding the complaint was not well-founded.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Investigation finds no evidence that Canadian Human Rights Commission accessed individual's Internet connection

Jan 29, 2009
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) improperly collected and used her personal information, alleging the CHRC accessed her wireless internet connection to post messages on a website. The investigation examined whether the CHRC contravened sections 4 to 8 of the Privacy Act. Ultimately, the OPC found no evidence that the CHRC collected or used the complainant's personal information, concluding the complaint was not well-founded.

Key Issues
  • Whether the IP address constitutes personal information under the Privacy Act.
  • Whether the CHRC collected and used the complainant's personal information during its investigations.
  • Whether the CHRC improperly disclosed or retained the complainant's personal information.