The catalogueFederal (Canada)
Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) privacy & access decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — each with an AI-generated plain-language summary for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Oct 30, 2014Early resolved case summary #9Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Early resolved case summary #9: Equipment store ends practice of photocopying driver’s licences as a condition of renting equipment - October 30, 2014

An equipment store

An individual complained that an equipment store required a scanned copy of his driver's license and a photograph as a condition for renting equipment. The store justified this practice by citing past losses of expensive rental equipment. The OPC informed the store that collecting driver's license information in this manner was generally inappropriate due to the excessive personal information contained on the license and its limited value in theft investigations. The OPC provided guidance on appropriate collection practices. As a result of the OPC's intervention, the store implemented a less privacy-invasive solution and trained its staff. The complainant was satisfied with the outcome.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #9: Equipment store ends practice of photocopying driver’s licences as a condition of renting equipment - October 30, 2014

Oct 30, 2014Early resolved case summary #9
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that an equipment store required a scanned copy of his driver's license and a photograph as a condition for renting equipment. The store justified this practice by citing past losses of expensive rental equipment. The OPC informed the store that collecting driver's license information in this manner was generally inappropriate due to the excessive personal information contained on the license and its limited value in theft investigations. The OPC provided guidance on appropriate collection practices. As a result of the OPC's intervention, the store implemented a less privacy-invasive solution and trained its staff. The complainant was satisfied with the outcome.

Key Issues
  • Whether requiring a scanned copy of a driver's license and a photograph for equipment rental constitutes appropriate collection of personal information under PIPEDA
  • Whether the collection of driver's license information is justified for addressing customer theft
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Jan 23, 2014Early resolved case summary #5Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Early resolved case summary #5: Web posting that was removed by individual retained by Internet search engine - January 23, 2014

An Internet search engine

An individual posted her résumé on a job website, which included her address. After having the job website remove the information, she discovered her résumé was still searchable via an Internet search engine. The individual contacted the search engine's Web administrator multiple times to request removal of her personal information, but the search engine did not comply. She then filed a complaint with the OPC. The OPC intervened directly with the search engine, which subsequently removed the cached copy of the individual's information from its search results using its URL removal tool. The complainant was satisfied with the outcome, and the complaint was closed.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActEarly-resolved

Early resolved case summary #5: Web posting that was removed by individual retained by Internet search engine - January 23, 2014

Jan 23, 2014Early resolved case summary #5
Adjudicator: Chantal Bernier
Plain-Language Summary

An individual posted her résumé on a job website, which included her address. After having the job website remove the information, she discovered her résumé was still searchable via an Internet search engine. The individual contacted the search engine's Web administrator multiple times to request removal of her personal information, but the search engine did not comply. She then filed a complaint with the OPC. The OPC intervened directly with the search engine, which subsequently removed the cached copy of the individual's information from its search results using its URL removal tool. The complainant was satisfied with the outcome, and the complaint was closed.

Key Issues
  • Whether an Internet search engine was obligated to remove cached personal information after the original source was deleted
  • Whether the search engine's refusal to remove the information constituted a contravention of PIPEDA