BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

3 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Nov 10, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015: Roofing company takes measures to ensure sub-contractors follow its privacy policy

A roofing company

An individual complained that an estimator, subcontracted by a roofing company, disclosed his personal information to another roofing company without consent. The investigation found that the second roofing company was responsible for its estimator's actions and that there was a disclosure of personal information in contravention of PIPEDA. The second roofing company implemented a recommendation to establish agreements with subcontractors regarding privacy policies and training.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015: Roofing company takes measures to ensure sub-contractors follow its privacy policy

Nov 10, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-015
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that an estimator, subcontracted by a roofing company, disclosed his personal information to another roofing company without consent. The investigation found that the second roofing company was responsible for its estimator's actions and that there was a disclosure of personal information in contravention of PIPEDA. The second roofing company implemented a recommendation to establish agreements with subcontractors regarding privacy policies and training.

Key Issues
  • Whether the subcontractor's actions were attributable to the organization.
  • Whether personal information was disclosed without consent.
  • Whether the disclosure exceeded the purposes for which the information was collected.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Jul 6, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010: Customer’s emails sent to her acquaintance following a telecom employee’s attempt to fix a problem with the customer’s email service

A telecommunications provider

An individual complained that her telecommunications provider disclosed her personal information without consent when a technical support representative remotely accessed her computer to fix an email issue. The representative inadvertently set up an automatic email forwarding to an acquaintance's address, causing personal emails, including a temporary password, to be sent to the wrong recipient. While the provider implemented corrective measures, the OPC noted the provider initially misrepresented steps taken to address the issue.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010: Customer’s emails sent to her acquaintance following a telecom employee’s attempt to fix a problem with the customer’s email service

Jul 6, 2015PIPEDA Case Summary #2015-010
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that her telecommunications provider disclosed her personal information without consent when a technical support representative remotely accessed her computer to fix an email issue. The representative inadvertently set up an automatic email forwarding to an acquaintance's address, causing personal emails, including a temporary password, to be sent to the wrong recipient. While the provider implemented corrective measures, the OPC noted the provider initially misrepresented steps taken to address the issue.

Key Issues
  • Disclosure of personal information without consent
  • Accuracy of representations made to the OPC
  • Adequacy of internal procedures and training
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Apr 13, 2015PIPEDA Report of Findings #2015-007· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2015-007: Financial institution takes strong remedial measures after insufficient safeguards and unnecessary storage leaves sensitive data vulnerable to breach

Peoples Trust

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigated Peoples Trust after a breach compromised the sensitive personal information of 12,000 customers. The investigation found that the financial institution failed to implement adequate safeguards in its online application portal and retained customer data unnecessarily on a vulnerable, unencrypted web server. These failures contravened PIPEDA's principles regarding safeguards and data retention. Following the breach, Peoples Trust took comprehensive remedial actions, including redesigning its portal, enhancing monitoring, and improving retention practices, which resolved the issues.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2015-007: Financial institution takes strong remedial measures after insufficient safeguards and unnecessary storage leaves sensitive data vulnerable to breach

Apr 13, 2015PIPEDA Report of Findings #2015-007
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada investigated Peoples Trust after a breach compromised the sensitive personal information of 12,000 customers. The investigation found that the financial institution failed to implement adequate safeguards in its online application portal and retained customer data unnecessarily on a vulnerable, unencrypted web server. These failures contravened PIPEDA's principles regarding safeguards and data retention. Following the breach, Peoples Trust took comprehensive remedial actions, including redesigning its portal, enhancing monitoring, and improving retention practices, which resolved the issues.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of information security safeguards for sensitive personal data.
  • Unnecessary retention of personal information beyond required purposes.
  • Vulnerabilities in web application portal development and maintenance.
  • Effectiveness of breach response and risk mitigation measures.