BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActResolved
Oct 29, 2013· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Correctional Service of Canada initially denies access to full report in favour of giving the “gist”

Correctional Service of Canada

A complainant alleged that Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) denied him access to the full version of a report concerning his treatment and supervision. CSC initially provided a condensed version, which the OPC found to be a misrepresentation of the information and contrary to CSC's obligations under the Privacy Act. Following the OPC's investigation, CSC provided the complainant with the full report, with some personal information of other parties withheld, and committed to reviewing its access request handling procedures and communicating staff obligations under the Privacy Act.

Quick View

Privacy ActResolved

Correctional Service of Canada initially denies access to full report in favour of giving the “gist”

Oct 29, 2013
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

A complainant alleged that Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) denied him access to the full version of a report concerning his treatment and supervision. CSC initially provided a condensed version, which the OPC found to be a misrepresentation of the information and contrary to CSC's obligations under the Privacy Act. Following the OPC's investigation, CSC provided the complainant with the full report, with some personal information of other parties withheld, and committed to reviewing its access request handling procedures and communicating staff obligations under the Privacy Act.

Key Issues
  • Was the respondent in compliance with its obligations to identify and provide all relevant information in response to an access request?
  • Whether the respondent's provision of an abbreviated report was a misrepresentation of the information.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved
Apr 25, 2013Early resolved case summary #2013-01· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Early resolved case summary #2013-01: Property management company alters its rental application form to make clear that Social Insurance Number is optional

A property management company

An individual complained that a property management company was over-collecting personal information, including Social Insurance Number (SIN), driver's licence information, and banking information, on its rental application forms. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) also investigated the company's lack of a privacy policy. The company committed to making it clear that the request for SIN, driver's licence, and banking information was optional and to posting a privacy policy on its website. The complainant was satisfied with these changes.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActResolved

Early resolved case summary #2013-01: Property management company alters its rental application form to make clear that Social Insurance Number is optional

Apr 25, 2013Early resolved case summary #2013-01
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a property management company was over-collecting personal information, including Social Insurance Number (SIN), driver's licence information, and banking information, on its rental application forms. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) also investigated the company's lack of a privacy policy. The company committed to making it clear that the request for SIN, driver's licence, and banking information was optional and to posting a privacy policy on its website. The complainant was satisfied with these changes.

Key Issues
  • Collection of SIN, driver's licence, and banking information on rental applications
  • Requirement for a privacy policy on the company website
  • Responsibility for third-party practices