BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)
Jul 1, 20222022 OIC 35· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2022 OIC 35

Government institution

The institution applied to the Information Commissioner to decline to act on an access request, arguing it was vexatious and an abuse of the right to access information. The requester had made multiple, repetitive requests for similar information, much of which had already been provided to them. The Commissioner found the request to be an abuse of the access right due to this pattern of behaviour and the fact that the requester was not seeking new information. The Commissioner also found that the institution had fulfilled its duty to assist the requester.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2022 OIC 35

Jul 1, 20222022 OIC 35
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The institution applied to the Information Commissioner to decline to act on an access request, arguing it was vexatious and an abuse of the right to access information. The requester had made multiple, repetitive requests for similar information, much of which had already been provided to them. The Commissioner found the request to be an abuse of the access right due to this pattern of behaviour and the fact that the requester was not seeking new information. The Commissioner also found that the institution had fulfilled its duty to assist the requester.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access request constituted an abuse of the right of access.
  • Whether the institution met its duty to assist obligations.
  • Whether the access request was vexatious.