Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 30

Organization: A federal institutionComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

A federal institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on an access to information request, arguing it was both vexatious and an abuse of the right of access. The request sought materials for a specific course offered during a particular period. The institution contended the request was repetitive, noting the requester had submitted over 900 requests, many of which were identical or substantially similar, and had already received the requested records and complained to the OIC regarding previous responses. The requester acknowledged some repetitiveness but denied any intent to be vexatious or abusive. The Commissioner found that while the volume of requests alone does not constitute abuse, the duplicative nature of the current request, which sought no new information and was entirely captured by previous requests, did. The Commissioner concluded that the repeated requests for substantively the same information, despite previous OIC investigations and available recourse to the Federal Court, constituted a misuse and abuse of the Access to Information Act. Consequently, the Commissioner granted the institution's application.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the access request was vexatious under s.6.1(1) ATIA
  2. 2Whether the access request was an abuse of the right of access under s.6.1(1) ATIA
  3. 3Whether the volume of requests alone substantiates a finding of abuse
  4. 4Whether the duplicative nature of the request, given previous requests, constitutes abuse
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Vexatious request: Institution's application granted
  • Abuse of right of access: Institution's application granted
Outcome

Section 6.1 application granted

Reasoning

The Commissioner found clear and compelling evidence that the request was an abuse of the right of access, specifically due to its duplicative nature and the requester's pattern of repeatedly seeking information already obtained, despite having exhausted complaint mechanisms. This misuse was deemed to unduly burden the institution and potentially impact other requesters.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.6.1(1) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro