BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)
Nov 1, 20242024 OIC 78· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2024 OIC 78

Government Institution

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline an access request, arguing it was an abuse of the right to access information. The institution estimated the request would generate over 8,200 emails and take years to process, significantly impacting its operations and other requesters' rights. However, the Commissioner found the institution failed to provide sufficient evidence of the request constituting an abuse or demonstrating a link between the estimated workload and interference with other requesters' rights. Consequently, the application was denied.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2024 OIC 78

Nov 1, 20242024 OIC 78
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline an access request, arguing it was an abuse of the right to access information. The institution estimated the request would generate over 8,200 emails and take years to process, significantly impacting its operations and other requesters' rights. However, the Commissioner found the institution failed to provide sufficient evidence of the request constituting an abuse or demonstrating a link between the estimated workload and interference with other requesters' rights. Consequently, the application was denied.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access request constitutes an abuse of the right of access.
  • Whether processing the request would overburden the institution and hinder other requesters' access rights.
  • The credibility of the institution's estimates regarding workload and processing time.
  • The institution's efforts to assist the requester in narrowing the scope of the request.
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)
Mar 1, 20242024 OIC 61· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2024 OIC 61

A federal institution

The Information Commissioner reviewed an institution's application to decline acting on an access request. The institution argued the request was an abuse of the right of access. However, the Commissioner found the institution's submissions insufficient and noted they failed to assist the requester or adequately demonstrate an abuse of access rights. Consequently, the Commissioner denied the application.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2024 OIC 61

Mar 1, 20242024 OIC 61
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The Information Commissioner reviewed an institution's application to decline acting on an access request. The institution argued the request was an abuse of the right of access. However, the Commissioner found the institution's submissions insufficient and noted they failed to assist the requester or adequately demonstrate an abuse of access rights. Consequently, the Commissioner denied the application.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access request constitutes an abuse of the right of access.
  • Sufficiency of the institution's evidence to support its application.
  • The institution's duty to assist the requester.