
Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2024 OIC 61
A federal institution applied to the Information Commissioner under subsection 6.1(1) of the Access to Information Act, seeking approval to decline to act on an access request. The institution argued that the request constituted an abuse of the right of access. However, the Commissioner found that the institution's submissions and evidence were insufficient to demonstrate that the access request met the criteria for abuse of right. The Commissioner noted that the institution appeared to confuse the issue of whether records were under its control with the question of abuse of right, and also failed to demonstrate any attempt to assist the requester. Consequently, the Commissioner decided that the application did not merit further consideration and denied the institution's request.
- 1Whether the access request constituted an abuse of the right of access under s.6.1(1) ATIA
- 2Whether the institution provided sufficient evidence to support its s.6.1 application
- 3Whether the institution attempted to assist the requester
- Abuse of right application: Institution's application denied
- Sufficiency of evidence: Evidence for abuse of right insufficient
- Duty to assist: Institution failed to demonstrate attempt to assist
Section 6.1 application denied
The institution failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the access request was an abuse of the right of access. The Commissioner also noted the institution's apparent confusion between record control and abuse of right, and its lack of effort to assist the requester.
The institution must notify the requester in writing of the date on which the running of the 30-day period to respond to the access request resumes.
- s.6.1 ATIA
- s.6(1.2) ATIA
- s.6(1.4) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro