BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Dec 21, 2009Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-024· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-024: Bank Disclosed Personal Information without Consent

A bank

A married couple complained that a bank mortgage specialist disclosed the husband's personal financial information to his wife without his consent. The bank argued there was implied consent given the purpose of applying for a joint mortgage. The Assistant Commissioner found the bank did not make a reasonable effort to inform the couple about potential disclosures between them, meaning consent was not meaningful. While a contravention was found, the bank had since adopted reasonable practices.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-024: Bank Disclosed Personal Information without Consent

Dec 21, 2009Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-024
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

A married couple complained that a bank mortgage specialist disclosed the husband's personal financial information to his wife without his consent. The bank argued there was implied consent given the purpose of applying for a joint mortgage. The Assistant Commissioner found the bank did not make a reasonable effort to inform the couple about potential disclosures between them, meaning consent was not meaningful. While a contravention was found, the bank had since adopted reasonable practices.

Key Issues
  • Meaningful consent for disclosure of personal information to a spouse
  • Reasonable efforts to inform individuals about purposes of disclosure
  • Implied consent in the context of joint mortgage applications
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Jul 16, 2009Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-008· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-008: Report of Findings: CIPPIC v. Facebook Inc.

Facebook Inc.

CIPPIC filed a complaint alleging 24 violations of PIPEDA by Facebook across 12 subjects, focusing on knowledge and consent. The Assistant Privacy Commissioner found Facebook contravened the Act in areas such as default privacy settings, advertising, third-party applications, account deactivation/deletion, deceased users' accounts, and non-users' personal information. While some allegations were resolved through Facebook's proposed corrective measures, others remained unresolved, particularly concerning third-party applications and the safeguarding of user data.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-008: Report of Findings: CIPPIC v. Facebook Inc.

Jul 16, 2009Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Case Summary #2009-008
Adjudicator: Elizabeth Denham
Plain-Language Summary

CIPPIC filed a complaint alleging 24 violations of PIPEDA by Facebook across 12 subjects, focusing on knowledge and consent. The Assistant Privacy Commissioner found Facebook contravened the Act in areas such as default privacy settings, advertising, third-party applications, account deactivation/deletion, deceased users' accounts, and non-users' personal information. While some allegations were resolved through Facebook's proposed corrective measures, others remained unresolved, particularly concerning third-party applications and the safeguarding of user data.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of notice and consent for collection, use, and disclosure of personal information.
  • Sufficiency of security safeguards for personal information.
  • Transparency regarding new uses of personal information and the implications of privacy settings.
  • Handling of personal information of non-users and deceased users.