BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded
Jun 12, 2018PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002: Company’s re-use of millions of Canadian Facebook user profiles violated privacy law

Profile Technology Ltd.

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated complaints against Profile Technology Ltd. (Profile Technology), a New Zealand-based company, for copying and using personal information from Facebook profiles without consent. The OPC found that Profile Technology's website was not merely a search engine but a social networking site, and that the information was not "publicly available" under PIPEDA. The company's practice of repurposing outdated Facebook data without consent or consideration for privacy settings was deemed inappropriate. Additionally, Profile Technology was found to be retaining help desk ticket information longer than necessary. The OPC concluded that Profile Technology contravened PIPEDA by using and disclosing personal information for purposes not appropriate in the circumstances and without consent.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded

PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002: Company’s re-use of millions of Canadian Facebook user profiles violated privacy law

Jun 12, 2018PIPEDA Report of Findings #2018-002
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated complaints against Profile Technology Ltd. (Profile Technology), a New Zealand-based company, for copying and using personal information from Facebook profiles without consent. The OPC found that Profile Technology's website was not merely a search engine but a social networking site, and that the information was not "publicly available" under PIPEDA. The company's practice of repurposing outdated Facebook data without consent or consideration for privacy settings was deemed inappropriate. Additionally, Profile Technology was found to be retaining help desk ticket information longer than necessary. The OPC concluded that Profile Technology contravened PIPEDA by using and disclosing personal information for purposes not appropriate in the circumstances and without consent.

Key Issues
  • Jurisdiction over a foreign-based organization
  • Definition of "publicly available" information under PIPEDA
  • Requirement for consent for collection and use of personal information
  • Appropriateness of purposes for using personal information