The catalogueFederal (Canada)
Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) privacy & access decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — each with an AI-generated plain-language summary for every ruling.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled
Federal (Canada) flag
Jan 6, 2010Settled Case summary #2010-001Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Settled Case summary #2010-001: Dental benefit information available to parents with daughter’s consent (January 6, 2010)

A dental plan administrator

The parents of a 17-year-old dependent complained that they could not access their daughter's online dental benefit information from their group dental plan administrator. The administrator's policy required consent from individuals aged 16 or older before their information could be accessed by another plan member, even parents. The administrator defended its policy by citing PIPEDA's consent requirements, the lack of a national age of majority consensus, and the distinction between age of majority and age of consent. The policy was based on the Ontario Health Care Consent Act, which suggests 16 as an age for health care consent. The mother was satisfied with the explanation and understood that she could access her daughter's account if her daughter provided consent by sharing her password.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled Case summary #2010-001: Dental benefit information available to parents with daughter’s consent (January 6, 2010)

Jan 6, 2010Settled Case summary #2010-001
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

The parents of a 17-year-old dependent complained that they could not access their daughter's online dental benefit information from their group dental plan administrator. The administrator's policy required consent from individuals aged 16 or older before their information could be accessed by another plan member, even parents. The administrator defended its policy by citing PIPEDA's consent requirements, the lack of a national age of majority consensus, and the distinction between age of majority and age of consent. The policy was based on the Ontario Health Care Consent Act, which suggests 16 as an age for health care consent. The mother was satisfied with the explanation and understood that she could access her daughter's account if her daughter provided consent by sharing her password.

Key Issues
  • Whether a dental plan administrator requires consent from a 17-year-old dependent to disclose her dental benefit information to her parents
  • Whether the age of majority or age of consent impacts the requirement for consent under PIPEDA for minors