BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

3 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Oct 5, 2010· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Border authority absolved of improperly gathering personal data from blog

Canada Border Services Agency

An individual complained that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) improperly collected personal information from his blog after his term position ended. The complainant posted information on the internet for public consumption. The investigation found that some CBSA employees had viewed the blog from government computers in a personal capacity, which was deemed to accord with the government's Acceptable Use Policy. The investigation found no evidence that the CBSA had collected personal information in connection with these visits.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Border authority absolved of improperly gathering personal data from blog

Oct 5, 2010
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) improperly collected personal information from his blog after his term position ended. The complainant posted information on the internet for public consumption. The investigation found that some CBSA employees had viewed the blog from government computers in a personal capacity, which was deemed to accord with the government's Acceptable Use Policy. The investigation found no evidence that the CBSA had collected personal information in connection with these visits.

Key Issues
  • Whether the CBSA collected personal information from an individual's public blog.
  • Whether employee access to the blog from government computers was in accordance with policy.
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Oct 5, 2010· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

RCMP and private polling firm safeguarded data on gun licensees

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

This investigation concerned the handling of personal information collected by the RCMP's Canadian Firearms Program and used by EKOS Research Associates Inc. to survey firearms licensees. The OPC found that the RCMP was authorized to collect the information for program administration and that its use for a client-satisfaction survey was consistent with the original purpose. The RCMP also complied with the Act in providing data to EKOS, as the contract included strong confidentiality provisions. As a result, the complaint was not well-founded.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

RCMP and private polling firm safeguarded data on gun licensees

Oct 5, 2010
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation concerned the handling of personal information collected by the RCMP's Canadian Firearms Program and used by EKOS Research Associates Inc. to survey firearms licensees. The OPC found that the RCMP was authorized to collect the information for program administration and that its use for a client-satisfaction survey was consistent with the original purpose. The RCMP also complied with the Act in providing data to EKOS, as the contract included strong confidentiality provisions. As a result, the complaint was not well-founded.

Key Issues
  • Lawful collection of personal information for program administration
  • Use of personal information for client-satisfaction surveys
  • Compliance with contractual confidentiality and security provisions
  • Adequacy of privacy impact assessments
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded
Oct 5, 2010· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Innocent targets of whistleblower law should learn of vindication

Public Works and Government Services Canada

A public servant complained that Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) failed to provide her with access to her personal information, collected during an investigation under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act. Although the investigation completely exonerated her, she was not informed of this outcome. The Office found that while PWGSC correctly applied section 22.3 of the Privacy Act to refuse disclosure, it urged the department to inform subjects when allegations are unsubstantiated. The Commissioner also asked the Treasury Board Secretariat to develop mechanisms for departments to inform individuals of unsubstantiated allegations.

Quick View

Privacy ActNot well-founded

Innocent targets of whistleblower law should learn of vindication

Oct 5, 2010
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

A public servant complained that Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) failed to provide her with access to her personal information, collected during an investigation under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act. Although the investigation completely exonerated her, she was not informed of this outcome. The Office found that while PWGSC correctly applied section 22.3 of the Privacy Act to refuse disclosure, it urged the department to inform subjects when allegations are unsubstantiated. The Commissioner also asked the Treasury Board Secretariat to develop mechanisms for departments to inform individuals of unsubstantiated allegations.

Key Issues
  • Access to personal information collected during a whistleblower investigation
  • Application of section 22.3 of the Privacy Act
  • Obligation to inform individuals when allegations of wrongdoing are unsubstantiated