BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

16 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Feb 11, 2019· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

The name of an individual is considered personal information if it is accompanied by information that is about the individual

Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA)

The complainant, an air passenger rights advocate, requested access to records about himself from the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA). The CTA denied access to most records, arguing the information was not personal information, or that it was exempt under various provisions of the Privacy Act. The OPC found that the CTA had erred in withholding information and improperly invoked exemptions under section 70(1). However, most information withheld under sections 26 and 27 was found to be properly exempted, with specific exceptions.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

The name of an individual is considered personal information if it is accompanied by information that is about the individual

Feb 11, 2019
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant, an air passenger rights advocate, requested access to records about himself from the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA). The CTA denied access to most records, arguing the information was not personal information, or that it was exempt under various provisions of the Privacy Act. The OPC found that the CTA had erred in withholding information and improperly invoked exemptions under section 70(1). However, most information withheld under sections 26 and 27 was found to be properly exempted, with specific exceptions.

Key Issues
  • Whether records containing the complainant's name and discussions about his advocacy activities constituted personal information under the Privacy Act.
  • Whether information withheld under paragraph 12(1)(b) was properly excluded from the scope of accessible personal information.
  • Whether information was correctly exempted under sections 26 (third-party personal information), 27 (solicitor-client privilege), and subsection 70(1) (cabinet confidences).