The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Mar 28, 2024PIPEDA Findings #2024-002Indexed Jun 30, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2024-002: Investigation into Brinks Home

Brinks Home

A Brinks Home customer complained that he could view other customers' personal information through his online portal. The OPC investigated whether Brinks Home had adequate security safeguards and complied with breach notification requirements. Brinks Home acknowledged an employee error caused 3,340 customer records to be accessible to 102 other customers, with up to 20 potentially accessing the data. The OPC found that Brinks Home failed to adequately protect personal information, but this issue was resolved by the company's corrective actions and subsequent sale of its Canadian customer accounts. Regarding breach notification, the OPC determined that while the information was sensitive, the probability of misuse was low because the unauthorized access was by known customers, not malicious actors. Therefore, the incident did not pose a real risk of significant harm, and Brinks Home was not required to report it or notify affected individuals.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2024-002: Investigation into Brinks Home

Mar 28, 2024PIPEDA Findings #2024-002
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

A Brinks Home customer complained that he could view other customers' personal information through his online portal. The OPC investigated whether Brinks Home had adequate security safeguards and complied with breach notification requirements. Brinks Home acknowledged an employee error caused 3,340 customer records to be accessible to 102 other customers, with up to 20 potentially accessing the data. The OPC found that Brinks Home failed to adequately protect personal information, but this issue was resolved by the company's corrective actions and subsequent sale of its Canadian customer accounts. Regarding breach notification, the OPC determined that while the information was sensitive, the probability of misuse was low because the unauthorized access was by known customers, not malicious actors. Therefore, the incident did not pose a real risk of significant harm, and Brinks Home was not required to report it or notify affected individuals.

Key Issues
  • Whether Brinks Home implemented adequate security safeguards to protect customers' personal information under Principle 4.7 of Schedule 1 of PIPEDA
  • Whether Brinks Home complied with breach notification requirements under section 10.1 of PIPEDA
  • Whether the breach presented a real risk of significant harm (RROSH)
  • Whether the personal information involved was sensitive
  • Whether the probability of misuse of the personal information was low