The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

46 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Dec 21, 2004Incident Summary #1Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Incident Summary #1: Misdirected faxes containing health information end up in apartment managers' hands

Dynacare and Viewpoint

This incident summary details two separate investigations into misdirected faxes containing personal health information. In both cases, faxes from Dynacare and Viewpoint were erroneously sent to apartment managers. The OPC found that both companies disclosed personal information without consent, contravening PIPEDA. Dynacare implemented an electronic auto-fax function and revised policies, while Viewpoint committed to retrieving misdirected faxes and verifying numbers. The Assistant Commissioner recommended both organizations implement OPC faxing guidelines, notify affected individuals, and annually update employee confidentiality agreements.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

Incident Summary #1: Misdirected faxes containing health information end up in apartment managers' hands

Dec 21, 2004Incident Summary #1
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

This incident summary details two separate investigations into misdirected faxes containing personal health information. In both cases, faxes from Dynacare and Viewpoint were erroneously sent to apartment managers. The OPC found that both companies disclosed personal information without consent, contravening PIPEDA. Dynacare implemented an electronic auto-fax function and revised policies, while Viewpoint committed to retrieving misdirected faxes and verifying numbers. The Assistant Commissioner recommended both organizations implement OPC faxing guidelines, notify affected individuals, and annually update employee confidentiality agreements.

Key Issues
  • Whether Dynacare disclosed personal information without consent, contrary to PIPEDA
  • Whether Viewpoint disclosed personal information without consent, contrary to PIPEDA
  • Whether Dynacare's security safeguards were adequate to prevent misdirected faxes
  • Whether Viewpoint's security safeguards were adequate to prevent misdirected faxes
  • Whether Dynacare should notify the affected individual
  • Whether Viewpoint should notify the affected individual