The catalogue

Canadian privacy & access decisions

The comprehensive archive of federal, provincial, and territorial commissioner decisions — each with a plain-language summary.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Oct 6, 2009Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Personal information leaked from DFAIT database

Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT)

The OPC investigated a complaint regarding the leak of a Canadian citizen's personal information from a DFAIT database, which was reported in the media in spring 2008. The investigation confirmed the information was held in an official consular record within DFAIT's computer system. A significant concern was that 1,231 DFAIT employees had access to these files, and the system lacked audit trail capabilities or mechanisms to restrict access to specific records. Consequently, the OPC could not identify the source of the leak. The complaint was found to be well-founded, and DFAIT agreed to implement corrective measures.

Quick view

Privacy ActWell-founded

Personal information leaked from DFAIT database

Oct 6, 2009
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

The OPC investigated a complaint regarding the leak of a Canadian citizen's personal information from a DFAIT database, which was reported in the media in spring 2008. The investigation confirmed the information was held in an official consular record within DFAIT's computer system. A significant concern was that 1,231 DFAIT employees had access to these files, and the system lacked audit trail capabilities or mechanisms to restrict access to specific records. Consequently, the OPC could not identify the source of the leak. The complaint was found to be well-founded, and DFAIT agreed to implement corrective measures.

Key Issues
  • Whether personal information was leaked from a DFAIT database
  • Whether DFAIT's security safeguards were adequate to protect personal information
  • Whether DFAIT's computer system had sufficient audit trail capabilities
  • Whether DFAIT's computer system had mechanisms to restrict access to particular files
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jul 27, 2009Report of FindingsIndexed Jun 30, 2026

Report of Findings: Complaint under PIPEDA against Accusearch Inc., doing business as Abika.com

Accusearch Inc., doing business as Abika.com

CIPPIC complained that Abika.com, a U.S. company, collected, used, and disclosed Canadians' personal information without consent, compiled and disclosed inaccurate personal information through its "psychological profile" service, and used personal information for inappropriate purposes. The OPC initially declined jurisdiction, but the Federal Court ordered the investigation to proceed. The OPC found that Abika collected and disclosed personal information, including telephone records, of Canadians without their knowledge or consent, often for inappropriate purposes such as investigating partners. While the OPC found the accuracy complaint not well-founded due to lack of verifiable evidence, it concluded that Abika contravened PIPEDA Principles 4.3 and subsection 5(3). Abika failed to respond adequately to the OPC's recommendations.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded

Report of Findings: Complaint under PIPEDA against Accusearch Inc., doing business as Abika.com

Jul 27, 2009Report of Findings
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

CIPPIC complained that Abika.com, a U.S. company, collected, used, and disclosed Canadians' personal information without consent, compiled and disclosed inaccurate personal information through its "psychological profile" service, and used personal information for inappropriate purposes. The OPC initially declined jurisdiction, but the Federal Court ordered the investigation to proceed. The OPC found that Abika collected and disclosed personal information, including telephone records, of Canadians without their knowledge or consent, often for inappropriate purposes such as investigating partners. While the OPC found the accuracy complaint not well-founded due to lack of verifiable evidence, it concluded that Abika contravened PIPEDA Principles 4.3 and subsection 5(3). Abika failed to respond adequately to the OPC's recommendations.

Key Issues
  • Whether Abika collected, used, and disclosed personal information of individuals living in Canada without their knowledge and consent, in contravention of Principle 4.3
  • Whether Abika compiled and disclosed inaccurate personal information through its "psychological profile" service, in contravention of Principle 4.6
  • Whether Abika collected, used, and disclosed personal information about Canadians for inappropriate purposes, in contravention of subsection 5(3)