BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Nov 7, 2003PIPEDA Case Summary #2003-243· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Case Summary #2003-243 — telecommunications company "B"

A telecommunications company

An individual complained that a telecommunications company failed to obtain adequate consent for the secondary marketing use and disclosure of customer data. The investigation found that the company's privacy code, policy, and customer activation process sufficiently informed customers of its marketing practices and their right to opt-out. The company also complied with CRTC restrictions on disclosing customer information. As a result, the Assistant Privacy Commissioner concluded that the company was in compliance with PIPEDA.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Case Summary #2003-243 — telecommunications company "B"

Nov 7, 2003PIPEDA Case Summary #2003-243
Adjudicator: Robert Marleau
Plain-Language Summary

An individual complained that a telecommunications company failed to obtain adequate consent for the secondary marketing use and disclosure of customer data. The investigation found that the company's privacy code, policy, and customer activation process sufficiently informed customers of its marketing practices and their right to opt-out. The company also complied with CRTC restrictions on disclosing customer information. As a result, the Assistant Privacy Commissioner concluded that the company was in compliance with PIPEDA.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of consent for secondary marketing purposes
  • Clarity and accessibility of privacy policies
  • Company's process for informing customers of data use and opt-out options