BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)
Nov 1, 20212021 OIC 30· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 30

institution

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline an access to information request, arguing it was vexatious and an abuse of access rights. The Commissioner found the request was an abuse of access rights due to its duplicative nature and a pattern of repeated requests for the same information, despite prior access requests and complaints. The Commissioner approved the institution's application to decline acting on the request.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 30

Nov 1, 20212021 OIC 30
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline an access to information request, arguing it was vexatious and an abuse of access rights. The Commissioner found the request was an abuse of access rights due to its duplicative nature and a pattern of repeated requests for the same information, despite prior access requests and complaints. The Commissioner approved the institution's application to decline acting on the request.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access to information request was an abuse of the right of access.
  • The repetitive and duplicative nature of the access request.
  • Whether the institution established that the request met the criteria under subsection 6.1(1) of the Access to Information Act.
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)
Jun 1, 20212021 OIC 20· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 20

institution

The institution applied for approval to decline acting on an access request for all internal correspondence over seven years, arguing it was an abuse of the right of access. The requester did not make submissions. The Commissioner found the request, due to its overbroad scope in combination with the institution's small size and limited resources, constituted an abuse of the right of access, and granted the institution's application.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Granted (refusal authorized)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 20

Jun 1, 20212021 OIC 20
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The institution applied for approval to decline acting on an access request for all internal correspondence over seven years, arguing it was an abuse of the right of access. The requester did not make submissions. The Commissioner found the request, due to its overbroad scope in combination with the institution's small size and limited resources, constituted an abuse of the right of access, and granted the institution's application.

Key Issues
  • Whether the request constitutes an abuse of the right of access under subsection 6.1(1) of the ATIA.
  • Whether the institution fulfilled its duty to assist the requester under subsection 4(2.1) of the ATIA.