BreachOfPrivacy

Canadian Privacy Decisions

The comprehensive archive of Canadian privacy decisions from federal, provincial, and territorial commissioners — with AI-summarized plain-language summaries for every decision.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)
Aug 1, 20212021 OIC 23· Indexed Apr 21, 2026

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 23

various institutions

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on two access requests, arguing they were vexatious, made in bad faith, and an abuse of access rights. The institution also claimed it met its duty to assist. The Commissioner denied the application, finding the institution failed to prove the requests were vexatious or made in bad faith. Furthermore, the institution did not demonstrate it fulfilled its duty to assist obligations prior to seeking approval to decline to act.

Quick View

Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2021 OIC 23

Aug 1, 20212021 OIC 23
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner for approval to decline to act on two access requests, arguing they were vexatious, made in bad faith, and an abuse of access rights. The institution also claimed it met its duty to assist. The Commissioner denied the application, finding the institution failed to prove the requests were vexatious or made in bad faith. Furthermore, the institution did not demonstrate it fulfilled its duty to assist obligations prior to seeking approval to decline to act.

Key Issues
  • Whether the access requests were vexatious, made in bad faith, or an abuse of the right of access.
  • Whether the institution fulfilled its duty to assist the requester.
  • Whether the institution provided sufficient evidence to support its claims.
  • The interpretation of 'vexatious' in the context of multiple access requests.