The catalogueFederal (Canada)
Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) privacy & access decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — each with an AI-generated plain-language summary for every ruling.

16 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Federal (Canada) flag
Feb 15, 2023Indexed Jun 30, 2026

TBS email breach illustrates the importance of considering context when assessing impact of a breach

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS)

Twenty complainants, current or former federal government employees, alleged that the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) improperly disclosed their personal information. TBS mistakenly sent two emails to 400 applicants for the Severe Phoenix Impacts program using the 'cc' field instead of 'bcc', revealing email addresses (some with names) and the fact they had filed a claim for Phoenix-related damages. The OPC found that the disclosure was not authorized under the Privacy Act, making the complaints well-founded. While TBS acknowledged the error, it initially deemed the breach non-material, a conclusion the OPC disagreed with, emphasizing the importance of contextual factors in assessing harm. TBS agreed to implement two of the OPC's three recommendations, but not the one concerning incorporating the findings on materiality into its policy instruments. The OPC concluded the complaints were well-founded and conditionally resolved in part, expressing ongoing concern about TBS's assessment of breach materiality.

Quick view

Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

TBS email breach illustrates the importance of considering context when assessing impact of a breach

Feb 15, 2023
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

Twenty complainants, current or former federal government employees, alleged that the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) improperly disclosed their personal information. TBS mistakenly sent two emails to 400 applicants for the Severe Phoenix Impacts program using the 'cc' field instead of 'bcc', revealing email addresses (some with names) and the fact they had filed a claim for Phoenix-related damages. The OPC found that the disclosure was not authorized under the Privacy Act, making the complaints well-founded. While TBS acknowledged the error, it initially deemed the breach non-material, a conclusion the OPC disagreed with, emphasizing the importance of contextual factors in assessing harm. TBS agreed to implement two of the OPC's three recommendations, but not the one concerning incorporating the findings on materiality into its policy instruments. The OPC concluded the complaints were well-founded and conditionally resolved in part, expressing ongoing concern about TBS's assessment of breach materiality.

Key Issues
  • Whether the disclosure of personal information via email was authorized under the Privacy Act
  • Whether the privacy breach was 'material' in nature according to TBS's guidelines
  • Whether TBS's assessment of the breach's materiality was appropriate
  • Whether the context of the personal information disclosed should be considered when assessing the risk of injury or harm