BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

4 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
May 7, 2026Special report to Parliament· Indexed May 8, 2026

Special report to Parliament: Investigation of unauthorized disclosures and modifications of taxpayer personal information at the Canada Revenue Agency

Canada Revenue Agency

This special report details an investigation into unauthorized disclosures and modifications of taxpayer personal information at the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) found that the CRA contravened the Privacy Act regarding accuracy and disclosure of personal information. While the CRA has made efforts to improve its security, shortcomings remain in prevention, monitoring, detection, remediation, and governance, particularly concerning the handling of "Unauthorized Use of Taxpayer Information by a Third Party" (UUTP) incidents. The investigation concluded that the CRA contravened subsections 6(2) and 8(2) of the Act.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

Special report to Parliament: Investigation of unauthorized disclosures and modifications of taxpayer personal information at the Canada Revenue Agency

May 7, 2026Special report to Parliament
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

This special report details an investigation into unauthorized disclosures and modifications of taxpayer personal information at the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) found that the CRA contravened the Privacy Act regarding accuracy and disclosure of personal information. While the CRA has made efforts to improve its security, shortcomings remain in prevention, monitoring, detection, remediation, and governance, particularly concerning the handling of "Unauthorized Use of Taxpayer Information by a Third Party" (UUTP) incidents. The investigation concluded that the CRA contravened subsections 6(2) and 8(2) of the Act.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of safeguards to protect taxpayer personal information from unauthorized disclosure and modification.
  • Timeliness and strength of multi-factor authentication implementation.
  • Effectiveness of monitoring and detection mechanisms for UUTPs.
  • Coordination and proactivity of the CRA's governance for addressing UUTPs.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Mar 5, 2026PIPEDA Findings #2026-001· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2026-001: Investigation into the personal information retention practices of Loblaw for the PC Optimum Loyalty Program

Loblaw Companies Ltd.

The OPC investigated Loblaw Companies Ltd. regarding complaints about the deletion of PC Optimum Loyalty Program accounts. The investigation found Loblaw contravened PIPEDA by taking an unreasonable amount of time to address deletion requests and by failing to ensure that retained purchase history data was sufficiently anonymized after account closures. Loblaw has agreed to take corrective actions, including a third-party assessment of its anonymization processes.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2026-001: Investigation into the personal information retention practices of Loblaw for the PC Optimum Loyalty Program

Mar 5, 2026PIPEDA Findings #2026-001
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

The OPC investigated Loblaw Companies Ltd. regarding complaints about the deletion of PC Optimum Loyalty Program accounts. The investigation found Loblaw contravened PIPEDA by taking an unreasonable amount of time to address deletion requests and by failing to ensure that retained purchase history data was sufficiently anonymized after account closures. Loblaw has agreed to take corrective actions, including a third-party assessment of its anonymization processes.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of Loblaw's processes for addressing individual privacy challenges regarding account deletion.
  • Compliance with PIPEDA's retention principle regarding anonymization of purchase history data.
  • Timeliness of Loblaw's response to customer deletion requests.
  • Sufficiency of Loblaw's anonymization techniques for retained data.
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Mar 3, 2026· Indexed Jun 5, 2026

Correctional Service of Canada Deleted Video

Correctional Service of Canada

An inmate alleged that Correctional Service Canada (CSC) failed to retain video footage of use of force incidents involving them, violating the Privacy Act's retention obligations. The OPC found that CSC did dispose of footage that it was obligated to retain for at least two years under the Act. CSC agreed to implement enhanced oversight, including monthly attestations and quarterly audits of use of force footage retention in its Pacific Region.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

Correctional Service of Canada Deleted Video

Mar 3, 2026
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

An inmate alleged that Correctional Service Canada (CSC) failed to retain video footage of use of force incidents involving them, violating the Privacy Act's retention obligations. The OPC found that CSC did dispose of footage that it was obligated to retain for at least two years under the Act. CSC agreed to implement enhanced oversight, including monthly attestations and quarterly audits of use of force footage retention in its Pacific Region.

Key Issues
  • Obligation to retain personal information used for administrative purposes under the Privacy Act
  • Adequacy of institutional policies for video retention
  • Ensuring reasonable access to personal information
  • Effectiveness of oversight measures for compliance
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Jan 9, 2026PIPEDA Findings #2026-003· Indexed Jun 5, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2026-003: Investigation into Bell’s compliance with PIPEDA when responding to an access request for personal information

Bell Canada

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated Bell Canada after a complainant alleged Bell contravened PIPEDA by not responding to an access request within 30 days and denying access to cellphone logs. The OPC found Bell contravened PIPEDA by delaying its response to the access request and by denying the complainant access to his phone logs, which were determined to be his personal information. Bell also failed to be open about its policies regarding shared account information. Bell has agreed to provide the requested logs and implement recommendations to improve its procedures for handling shared account requests and its privacy communications.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2026-003: Investigation into Bell’s compliance with PIPEDA when responding to an access request for personal information

Jan 9, 2026PIPEDA Findings #2026-003
Adjudicator: Philippe Dufresne
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated Bell Canada after a complainant alleged Bell contravened PIPEDA by not responding to an access request within 30 days and denying access to cellphone logs. The OPC found Bell contravened PIPEDA by delaying its response to the access request and by denying the complainant access to his phone logs, which were determined to be his personal information. Bell also failed to be open about its policies regarding shared account information. Bell has agreed to provide the requested logs and implement recommendations to improve its procedures for handling shared account requests and its privacy communications.

Key Issues
  • Timeliness of response to an access request
  • Access to personal information held by a service provider on a shared account
  • Definition of personal information in the context of phone logs
  • Openness of an organization's privacy policies and practices