BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Dec 14, 2020PIPEDA Findings #2020-005· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2020-005: Investigation into Desjardins’ compliance with PIPEDA following a breach of personal information between 2017 and 2019

Desjardins

This investigation examined Desjardins' compliance with PIPEDA following a significant data breach that occurred between 2017 and 2019, affecting nearly 9.7 million individuals. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that Desjardins contravened PIPEDA principles regarding accountability, data retention, and security safeguards. While Desjardins' mitigation measures for affected individuals were deemed adequate, the OPC issued recommendations to address the identified contraventions.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2020-005: Investigation into Desjardins’ compliance with PIPEDA following a breach of personal information between 2017 and 2019

Dec 14, 2020PIPEDA Findings #2020-005
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation examined Desjardins' compliance with PIPEDA following a significant data breach that occurred between 2017 and 2019, affecting nearly 9.7 million individuals. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that Desjardins contravened PIPEDA principles regarding accountability, data retention, and security safeguards. While Desjardins' mitigation measures for affected individuals were deemed adequate, the OPC issued recommendations to address the identified contraventions.

Key Issues
  • Adequacy of security safeguards throughout the personal information lifecycle.
  • Compliance with accountability principles, including implementing procedures and training staff.
  • Appropriateness of data retention and destruction practices.
  • Effectiveness of mitigation measures offered to individuals affected by the breach.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved
Jun 30, 2020PIPEDA Findings #2020-002· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

PIPEDA Findings #2020-002: Health practitioner ratings site ceases charging for rating takedowns, a PIPEDA “no-go-zone”

RateMDs.com

A dentist complained that RateMDs.com, a health practitioner rating website, used her personal information without consent and for lucrative purposes. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that the dentist's business contact information was publicly available and did not require consent. However, the OPC found that RateMDs.com engaged in an inappropriate practice by charging a subscription fee for a service that allowed users to hide certain reviews, contravening PIPEDA's purpose provisions. RateMDs.com agreed to cease this practice, leading to a conditionally resolved outcome for that issue. The OPC also found RateMDs.com resolved issues related to openness regarding its policies on correcting inaccurate information.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2020-002: Health practitioner ratings site ceases charging for rating takedowns, a PIPEDA “no-go-zone”

Jun 30, 2020PIPEDA Findings #2020-002
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

A dentist complained that RateMDs.com, a health practitioner rating website, used her personal information without consent and for lucrative purposes. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that the dentist's business contact information was publicly available and did not require consent. However, the OPC found that RateMDs.com engaged in an inappropriate practice by charging a subscription fee for a service that allowed users to hide certain reviews, contravening PIPEDA's purpose provisions. RateMDs.com agreed to cease this practice, leading to a conditionally resolved outcome for that issue. The OPC also found RateMDs.com resolved issues related to openness regarding its policies on correcting inaccurate information.

Key Issues
  • Consent for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information.
  • The appropriateness of using personal information for a business model.
  • Transparency and openness regarding policies for correcting inaccurate information.
  • The balance between privacy rights and public interest in online reviews.