BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Dec 20, 2016· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

The PBC refuses to process requests for record suspension information

Parole Board of Canada

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) investigated two complaints against the Parole Board of Canada (PBC) concerning access to record suspension information. The OPC found that the PBC improperly refused to process access requests submitted by a third-party screening company and also improperly required requesters to provide excessive identification information. The OPC concluded that the PBC's reliance on paragraph 22(1)(b) of the Privacy Act was not justified in most cases, and its identification requirements went beyond what was necessary.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

The PBC refuses to process requests for record suspension information

Dec 20, 2016
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) investigated two complaints against the Parole Board of Canada (PBC) concerning access to record suspension information. The OPC found that the PBC improperly refused to process access requests submitted by a third-party screening company and also improperly required requesters to provide excessive identification information. The OPC concluded that the PBC's reliance on paragraph 22(1)(b) of the Privacy Act was not justified in most cases, and its identification requirements went beyond what was necessary.

Key Issues
  • Can a requester ask to confirm that no personal information exists?
  • Is paragraph 22(1)(b) of the Privacy Act properly applied to refuse access requests for record suspension information?
  • Are the PBC's identification requirements for processing requests excessive?
Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded
Jun 6, 2016· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

TV show raises numerous questions of consent

Canada Border Services Agency

The OPC investigated two complaints regarding the Canada Border Services Agency's (CBSA) participation in the TV show "Border Security: Canada's Front Line". The investigation focused on a complaint filed by the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association on behalf of an individual filmed during a CBSA enforcement activity. The OPC found that the CBSA's participation and disclosure of personal information to the production company, Force Four, violated sections 4 and 8 of the Privacy Act due to issues with informed consent and improper disclosure of information. The OPC recommended the CBSA cease its participation in the TV program, which the CBSA accepted.

Quick View

Privacy ActWell-founded

TV show raises numerous questions of consent

Jun 6, 2016
Adjudicator: Daniel Therrien
Plain-Language Summary

The OPC investigated two complaints regarding the Canada Border Services Agency's (CBSA) participation in the TV show "Border Security: Canada's Front Line". The investigation focused on a complaint filed by the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association on behalf of an individual filmed during a CBSA enforcement activity. The OPC found that the CBSA's participation and disclosure of personal information to the production company, Force Four, violated sections 4 and 8 of the Privacy Act due to issues with informed consent and improper disclosure of information. The OPC recommended the CBSA cease its participation in the TV program, which the CBSA accepted.

Key Issues
  • Validity of consent obtained for filming and disclosure of personal information
  • CBSA's ability to contract out of Privacy Act obligations
  • Adequacy of facial blurring to protect identity
  • Disclosure of information about an intended subject prior to filming