The catalogueFederal (Canada)
Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) privacy & access decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — each with an AI-generated plain-language summary for every ruling.

271 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded
Federal (Canada) flag
Jan 14, 20205819-00733Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Re), 2020 OIC 1

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to respond to an access to information request within the statutory time limits. The request, submitted on July 3, 2018, had a due date of August 2, 2018. The RCMP was deemed to have refused access under subsection 10(3) of the Act as it did not respond or take an extension. Despite multiple requests from the OIC for information regarding the delay and a proposed disclosure date, the RCMP provided no rationale for the delay, only citing high volume and resource pressures. The OIC found that the responsive records were not voluminous or complex and had been in the RCMP's possession since July 2018. An initial report with an intended order was sent to the Minister, but before the order could be issued, the RCMP released the records. Consequently, the complaint was found to be well-founded, but no order was issued as the records were released.

Quick view

Access to Information ActWell-founded

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Re), 2020 OIC 1

Jan 14, 20205819-00733
Adjudicator: Caroline Maynard
Plain-Language Summary

The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to respond to an access to information request within the statutory time limits. The request, submitted on July 3, 2018, had a due date of August 2, 2018. The RCMP was deemed to have refused access under subsection 10(3) of the Act as it did not respond or take an extension. Despite multiple requests from the OIC for information regarding the delay and a proposed disclosure date, the RCMP provided no rationale for the delay, only citing high volume and resource pressures. The OIC found that the responsive records were not voluminous or complex and had been in the RCMP's possession since July 2018. An initial report with an intended order was sent to the Minister, but before the order could be issued, the RCMP released the records. Consequently, the complaint was found to be well-founded, but no order was issued as the records were released.

Key Issues
  • Whether the institution responded to the access request within the statutory time limits
  • Whether the institution was deemed to have refused access under subsection 10(3) of the Act
  • Whether the institution provided adequate rationale for the delay in responding
  • Whether the institution provided a reasonable disclosure date