BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) Privacy Decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — with AI-generated plain-language summaries for every ruling.

2 decisions matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Apr 2, 2007Report of Findings· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Report of Findings: Privacy Commissioner of Canada v. SWIFT

SWIFT

This investigation concerned SWIFT's disclosure of personal information originating from Canadian financial institutions to the US Department of the Treasury in response to administrative subpoenas. The OPC found that PIPEDA applied to SWIFT's commercial activities in Canada. However, the Commissioner concluded that SWIFT's disclosure of information to comply with valid US subpoenas was permissible under PIPEDA, interpreting subsection 7(3)(c) to allow compliance with lawful orders from foreign jurisdictions where the organization operates. The Commissioner recommended that US authorities use existing information-sharing mechanisms rather than subpoenas to obtain Canadian financial data.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

Report of Findings: Privacy Commissioner of Canada v. SWIFT

Apr 2, 2007Report of Findings
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation concerned SWIFT's disclosure of personal information originating from Canadian financial institutions to the US Department of the Treasury in response to administrative subpoenas. The OPC found that PIPEDA applied to SWIFT's commercial activities in Canada. However, the Commissioner concluded that SWIFT's disclosure of information to comply with valid US subpoenas was permissible under PIPEDA, interpreting subsection 7(3)(c) to allow compliance with lawful orders from foreign jurisdictions where the organization operates. The Commissioner recommended that US authorities use existing information-sharing mechanisms rather than subpoenas to obtain Canadian financial data.

Key Issues
  • Does PIPEDA apply to SWIFT's collection, use, and disclosure of personal information in its Canadian operations?
  • Was personal information disclosed to US authorities in accordance with PIPEDA?
  • Interpretation of subsection 7(3)(c) regarding compliance with foreign subpoenas.
  • Balancing privacy protection with counter-terrorism financing efforts.
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded
Apr 2, 2007Executive Summary· Indexed Apr 12, 2026

Executive Summary: Privacy Commissioner of Canada v. SWIFT

SWIFT SCRL (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication)

This investigation concerned allegations that SWIFT inappropriately disclosed personal information from Canadian financial institutions to the US Department of the Treasury (UST) via administrative subpoenas. The Privacy Commissioner of Canada determined that SWIFT was subject to PIPEDA due to its operations in Canada and its commercial activities involving Canadian banks. While SWIFT disclosed data held in the US to the UST in response to a subpoena, the Commissioner found this disclosure was permissible under the Act's exceptions to consent.

Quick View

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

Executive Summary: Privacy Commissioner of Canada v. SWIFT

Apr 2, 2007Executive Summary
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

This investigation concerned allegations that SWIFT inappropriately disclosed personal information from Canadian financial institutions to the US Department of the Treasury (UST) via administrative subpoenas. The Privacy Commissioner of Canada determined that SWIFT was subject to PIPEDA due to its operations in Canada and its commercial activities involving Canadian banks. While SWIFT disclosed data held in the US to the UST in response to a subpoena, the Commissioner found this disclosure was permissible under the Act's exceptions to consent.

Key Issues
  • Whether SWIFT is subject to PIPEDA
  • Whether SWIFT inappropriately disclosed personal information to the UST
  • Applicability of PIPEDA exceptions to disclosure in response to a subpoena