The catalogueFederal (Canada)
Federal (Canada)

Federal (Canada) privacy & access decisions

Browse privacy decisions from Federal (Canada) — each with an AI-generated plain-language summary for every ruling.

1 decision matching
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActDeclined to investigate
Federal (Canada) flag
Sep 11, 2013Declined to Investigate Case Summary #2013-001Indexed Jun 30, 2026

Declined to Investigate Case Summary #2013-001: Court procedures provided a more appropriate means to address access issues in ongoing litigation between complainant and retailer

A retailer

An individual filed a complaint against a retailer, alleging that the retailer withheld access to her personal information, contravening subsection 8(3) and Principle 4.9 of PIPEDA. The complainant and retailer were involved in ongoing small claims court litigation, and the complainant stated the information was necessary for her case. The retailer refused access, citing litigation privilege and prior disclosure. The OPC declined to investigate the complaint, finding that the court's procedures provided a more appropriate means for the complainant to address the access issues. This decision was based on avoiding conflict with provincial court rules and ensuring judicious use of public resources.

Quick view

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActDeclined to investigate

Declined to Investigate Case Summary #2013-001: Court procedures provided a more appropriate means to address access issues in ongoing litigation between complainant and retailer

Sep 11, 2013Declined to Investigate Case Summary #2013-001
Adjudicator: Jennifer Stoddart
Plain-Language Summary

An individual filed a complaint against a retailer, alleging that the retailer withheld access to her personal information, contravening subsection 8(3) and Principle 4.9 of PIPEDA. The complainant and retailer were involved in ongoing small claims court litigation, and the complainant stated the information was necessary for her case. The retailer refused access, citing litigation privilege and prior disclosure. The OPC declined to investigate the complaint, finding that the court's procedures provided a more appropriate means for the complainant to address the access issues. This decision was based on avoiding conflict with provincial court rules and ensuring judicious use of public resources.

Key Issues
  • Whether the complaint could more appropriately be dealt with by means of a procedure provided for under the laws of a province under paragraph 12(1)(b) of PIPEDA
  • Whether the retailer withheld access to personal information in contravention of subsection 8(3) of PIPEDA
  • Whether the retailer withheld access to personal information in contravention of Principle 4.9 of Schedule 1 of PIPEDA