
Video surveillance of employees vs. right to privacy - a delicate balance - November 13, 2014
A complaint was filed against the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) alleging that its use of video surveillance to monitor employees at a border crossing contravened the Privacy Act. The complainant argued that the CBSA was using video technology to collect personal information for monitoring employee conduct and performance, beyond the initial safety and security purposes, and that signage was insufficient. While the CBSA's signage issue was resolved, the investigation focused on the collection of employee information for monitoring. The OPC found that the CBSA's updated policies and rationale for collecting personal information for integrity and quality assurance, including investigating serious misconduct, met the Act's requirements, but awaited confirmation of updated guidelines.
- Use of video surveillance for monitoring employee conduct and performance
- Necessity and proportionality of collecting personal information via video surveillance
- Sufficiency of signage informing employees of video monitoring
- Compliance with the Privacy Act's requirement that personal information collection relates directly to an operating program or activity
Complaint conditionally resolved
The OPC found that while the CBSA's updated policies and rationale for using video for integrity and quality assurance met the Privacy Act's standards for collecting personal information, the complaint remained conditionally resolved pending the submission and satisfaction of updated implementation guidelines.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
The CBSA committed to providing updated guidelines for staff implementing its video monitoring policy, which the OPC will review to consider the complaint fully resolved.
- s. 4 Privacy Act
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

