Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded

Records deemed 'transitory' prematurely destroyed - February 10, 2015

Organization: Department of National Defence (DND)Complainant: A former Canadian Forces member
Plain-language brief

A former Canadian Forces member complained that the Department of National Defence (DND) prematurely destroyed an audio recording of his Progress Review Board (PRB) hearing, thereby contravening the retention and disposal provisions of the Privacy Act. The complainant argued that the recording was personal information used for an administrative purpose and should have been retained for a reasonable period to allow him access. DND contended the recording was a "transitory" record, destroyed after minutes were drafted, and that the complainant had implicitly consented to its disposal by signing the minutes. The OPC found that the audio recording contained personal information used for an administrative purpose and that the complainant had not consented to its disposal. Therefore, DND was obligated to retain the recording for at least two years.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the audio recording contained the complainant's "personal information" as defined by the Act
  2. 2Whether the personal information in the audio recording was used for an "administrative purpose"
  3. 3Whether the complainant consented to the disposal of the information
  4. 4Whether DND's classification of the recording as "transitory" exempted it from Privacy Act retention requirements
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Personal information: Audio recording deemed personal information
  • Administrative purpose: Audio recording used for administrative purpose
  • Consent to disposal: No consent to disposal found
  • Retention period: DND obligated to retain recording for two years
Outcome

Complaint well-founded — corrective measures recommended

Reasoning

The OPC found that the audio recording contained personal information used for an administrative purpose, triggering the two-year retention requirement under the Privacy Act. DND failed to obtain the complainant's consent for early disposal, and the "transitory" nature of the record did not override the Act's requirements.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

DND is encouraged to develop and implement a policy/procedures for the collection, retention, and disposal of information collected during PRB hearings, specifically addressing section 6 of the Act for audio recordings. In the interim, DND is recommended to retain PRB recordings or verbatim transcriptions for at least two years, unless consent for earlier destruction is obtained from the individual.

Statutes considered
  • s.3 Privacy Act
  • s.6(1) Privacy Act
  • s.6(2) Privacy Act
  • s.4 Privacy Regulations

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro