Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded & conditionally resolved

Protecting privacy in a pandemic

Organization: Federal Government Institutions and Biron Health Group
Plain-language brief

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) tabled a Special Report to Parliament summarizing investigations and advisory initiatives concerning the federal government's privacy practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. The report examined vaccine mandates for domestic travel, entry into Canada, and federal employees, as well as the ArriveCAN application, the collection of de-identified mobility data, and information sharing under the Emergencies Act. Overall, the OPC found that federal institutions generally complied with the Privacy Act, with some exceptions and areas for improvement. A significant finding was a breach of the Privacy Act by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) due to an error in the ArriveCAN app that inaccurately identified approximately 10,000 fully vaccinated travellers as needing to quarantine; this issue was subsequently corrected. The Treasury Board of Canada also contravened section 11 of the Privacy Act by not timely publishing a Personal Information Bank description, which was later rectified. The report also included a PIPEDA investigation where Biron Health Group improperly used personal information for marketing, which was settled. The OPC made several recommendations to various institutions regarding necessity, proportionality, transparency, and safeguarding of personal information, some of which were accepted, while others, like a recommendation to the Department of National Defence regarding oversight of a data system, were not. The report emphasized the need for modernized privacy laws and clear guidance for information sharing during crises.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the collection of COVID-19 vaccination status for domestic travel was lawful under the Privacy Act
  2. 2Whether the collection of COVID-19 vaccination status for domestic travel was necessary and proportional
  3. 3Whether the handling of personal information collected for domestic travel vaccine mandates was reasonable
  4. 4Whether the collection of COVID-19 vaccination status for entry into Canada was lawful under the Privacy Act
  5. 5Whether the collection of COVID-19 vaccination status for entry into Canada was necessary and proportional
  6. 6Whether the collection of federal employees' vaccination status and related medical/religious information was lawful under the Privacy Act
  7. 7Whether the collection of federal employees' vaccination status and related medical/religious information was necessary and proportional
  8. 8Whether the Monitor-MASS system used by DND/CAF had adequate oversight to prevent unauthorized access to personal information
  9. 9Whether there were inappropriate disclosures of personal information related to federal employee vaccination status
  10. 10Whether the Treasury Board of Canada contravened section 11 of the Privacy Act by not timely publishing a Personal Information Bank description
  11. 11Whether the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) took all reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy of information in the ArriveCAN app under section 6 of the Privacy Act
  12. 12Whether the collection and use of de-identified mobility data by PHAC constituted the collection of personal information under the Privacy Act
  13. 13Whether Biron Health Group obtained valid consent under PIPEDA for using personal information collected for COVID-19 testing for marketing purposes
  14. 14Whether information sharing by RCMP, FINTRAC, and CSIS under the Emergencies Act complied with the Privacy Act
  15. 15Whether information sharing under the Emergencies Act was necessary and proportionate
  16. 16Whether there was clear direction and guidance for information sharing under the Emergencies Act
  17. 17Whether appropriate safeguards were in place for personal information shared under the Emergencies Act
  18. 18The need for modernized privacy laws to address necessity, proportionality, and de-identified information
  19. 19The importance of transparency and accountability in government initiatives involving personal information during crises
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Compliance with Privacy Act: General compliance found, with exceptions
  • ArriveCAN app error: CBSA breached Privacy Act
  • Personal Information Bank publication: Treasury Board contravened Privacy Act s.11
  • PIPEDA marketing use: Biron Health Group settled investigation
  • Recommendations to institutions: Some accepted, some not
Outcome

Mixed findings, with some contraventions found and resolved, and recommendations made for improved privacy practices.

Reasoning

The OPC found a mix of compliance, contraventions, and areas for improvement across various federal government initiatives during the pandemic. While many measures were deemed necessary and proportional in the crisis context, specific breaches of the Privacy Act were identified, and recommendations were made to enhance privacy protection and transparency for future crises.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.4 Privacy Act
  • s.6 Privacy Act
  • s.7 Privacy Act
  • s.8 Privacy Act
  • s.10 Privacy Act
  • s.11 Privacy Act
  • s.39(1) Privacy Act
  • Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
  • Quarantine Act
  • Emergencies Act
  • Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA)
  • Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act (CSIS Act)
  • Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) Directive on Privacy Practices

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro