
Name tags for border officers not a violation - September 16, 2014
A group of Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) employees complained that a new policy requiring them to wear name tags displaying their surnames, instead of badge numbers, violated sections 7 and 8 of the Privacy Act. They argued this constituted an unreasonable invasion of privacy and made them vulnerable to violence and intimidation, as their names could be used to find personal information. The CBSA contended that the name tags were part of a service excellence initiative, promoted professionalism and accountability, and that an employee's name on a name tag falls under an exception to the definition of personal information in the Act. The OPC found that while a surname on a name tag is information about an identifiable individual, it falls under paragraph (j) of the definition of personal information, which excludes information relating to the position or functions of a government employee for the purposes of sections 7 and 8. Therefore, the OPC concluded that the policy did not violate the Act.
- 1Whether the surname of a Border Services Officer (BSO) displayed on a name tag constitutes "personal information" under section 3 of the Privacy Act
- 2Whether the surname on a name tag falls within the exception to the definition of personal information under paragraph (j) of section 3 of the Privacy Act
- 3Whether the CBSA's requirement for BSOs to wear name tags displaying their surnames violates sections 7 and 8 of the Privacy Act
- Definition of personal information: Surname on name tag excluded under paragraph (j)
- Violation of Privacy Act: Policy did not violate the Act
Complaint not well-founded
The OPC found that the surname on a name tag relates to the duties and functions of a BSO and therefore falls under the exception in paragraph (j) of the definition of personal information under section 3 of the Privacy Act, meaning it is not considered personal information for the purposes of sections 7 and 8 of the Act.
- s.3 Privacy Act
- s.7 Privacy Act
- s.8 Privacy Act
- s.3(j) Privacy Act
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro