Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded

Investigation of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada’s disclosure of personal information to the Canada Border Services Agency

Organization: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)Complainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) inappropriately disclosed his Permanent Resident Card (PRC) renewal paperwork to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), which was then used in a cessation application, contrary to the purpose for which it was collected. The OPC investigated whether IRCC was authorized to disclose this personal information to the CBSA under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act, which permits disclosure for a consistent use. IRCC and CBSA argued that their information sharing for the administration and enforcement of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) constitutes a consistent use. The OPC found that the privacy notice on the PRC renewal application and the relevant Personal Information Bank (PIB) explicitly stated that information might be shared with CBSA for investigations related to immigration legislation. Therefore, the OPC concluded that the disclosure was for a consistent use, and the complaints against both departments were not well-founded.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether IRCC's disclosure of the complainant's personal information to CBSA was authorized under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act
  2. 2Whether the use of the personal information by CBSA in a cessation application was consistent with the purpose for which it was collected by IRCC
  3. 3Whether the complainant could reasonably expect the disclosure of his PRC renewal application to CBSA for immigration investigations
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Disclosure of personal information: Disclosure was for a consistent use
  • Complaint against IRCC: Complaint not well-founded
  • Complaint against CBSA: Complaint not well-founded
Outcome

Complaint not well-founded

Reasoning

The OPC found that the disclosure was for a use consistent with the purpose for which the information was collected, as outlined in the privacy notice and the relevant Personal Information Bank, which explicitly permitted sharing with CBSA for immigration investigations.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.8(1) Privacy Act
  • s.8(2)(a) Privacy Act
  • s.7(a) Privacy Act

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro