Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded

Investigation into the collection and use of de-identified mobility data in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic

Organization: Public Health Agency of CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicants
Plain-language brief

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated 12 complaints against the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and Health Canada regarding their collection and use of de-identified mobility data during the COVID-19 pandemic. Complainants alleged PHAC secretly collected data on 33 million mobile devices. PHAC maintained it only used de-identified and aggregated data, arguing the Privacy Act did not apply as no personal information was collected. The OPC's primary issue was whether the mobility data constituted "personal information" under Section 3 of the Privacy Act, specifically if de-identification and safeguards reduced re-identification risk below the "serious possibility" threshold. The investigation examined two data streams, from TELUS and BlueDot, and assessed the de-identification techniques, aggregation levels, access controls, and contractual safeguards in place. The OPC concluded that the combination of these measures reduced the risk of identifying individuals below the "serious possibility" threshold. Consequently, the complaints were found to be not well-founded, as the data did not meet the definition of personal information under the Act. Despite this finding, the OPC made several recommendations to PHAC concerning ongoing assessment of de-identification techniques, due diligence with data providers, and enhanced transparency, which PHAC accepted.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether mobility data collected and used by PHAC constituted "personal information" as defined under Section 3 of the Privacy Act.
  2. 2Whether de-identification techniques and safeguards against re-identification were sufficient to reduce the risk of an individual being identified below the "serious possibility" threshold.
  3. 3Whether access to data within TELUS's system constituted "collection" under the Privacy Act.
  4. 4Whether de-identification alone is sufficient to render mobility data non-personal.
  5. 5Whether robust contractual and physical protections were in place to limit access and use of de-identified data.
  6. 6Whether acceptable data aggregation levels and access controls existed for aggregated mobility data.
  7. 7Whether PHAC was sufficiently transparent with the public about its use of mobility data.
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Definition of personal information: Mobility data not personal information
  • De-identification effectiveness: Risk of re-identification below 'serious possibility' threshold
  • Privacy Act applicability: Privacy Act not applicable to data collected
  • Complaint outcome: Complaints not well-founded
  • Recommendations to institution: Recommendations made and accepted
Outcome

Complaints not well-founded

Reasoning

The OPC determined that the de-identification measures and safeguards implemented by PHAC and its data providers, including robust hashing, aggregation to minimum cell sizes, and strict access controls, effectively reduced the risk of re-identifying individuals below the "serious possibility" threshold. Therefore, the mobility data did not constitute "personal information" as defined by Section 3 of the Privacy Act, rendering the Act inapplicable to PHAC's collection and use of this specific data.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • Section 3 of the Privacy Act

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro