
Investigation into COVID-19 vaccination attestation requirements established by Department of National Defence for members of the Canadian Armed Forces
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated 16 complaints against the Department of National Defence (DND) and the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) regarding their COVID-19 vaccination attestation requirements. Complainants alleged unreasonable collection, improper use, insufficient access controls in the Monitor MASS system leading to unauthorized disclosure, and inaccurate data. The OPC found that the collection of vaccination status information, including for accommodation requests, directly related to DND's operating programs for health and safety and operational readiness, satisfying section 4 of the Privacy Act. The use of this information was also deemed consistent with the purposes for which it was collected, in line with section 7. While concerns were raised about Monitor MASS access controls, the OPC found no evidence of actual unauthorized disclosures, thus deeming this allegation not well-founded, though it did recommend improved oversight which DND declined. Furthermore, DND was found to have taken reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy of vaccination status data under section 6(2). The OPC also concluded that the measures were necessary and proportional given the pandemic context and the CAF's unique operational role.
- 1Whether the collection of personal information, including vaccination status and accommodation request details, by DND/CAF related directly to an operating program or activity of the institution as required by section 4 of the Privacy Act.
- 2Whether the use of the personal information collected under the Directive was authorized under section 7 of the Privacy Act, specifically for applying administrative consequences.
- 3Whether the use of Monitor MASS for collection and storage of CAF members' vaccination status resulted in unauthorized disclosure of information due to insufficient access controls, contrary to section 8(1) of the Privacy Act.
- 4Whether DND took reasonable steps to ensure that personal information used for determining the COVID-19 vaccination status of CAF members was accurate, up-to-date, and complete as required by section 6(2) of the Privacy Act.
- 5Whether the COVID-19 vaccination attestation requirements and associated information collection were necessary and proportional, applying the OPC's four-part test.
- Collection of personal information: Collection upheld under s.4
- Use of personal information: Use upheld under s.7
- Unauthorized disclosure: No evidence of unauthorized disclosure
- Accuracy of personal information: Reasonable steps taken to ensure accuracy
- Necessity and proportionality: Measures deemed necessary and proportional
Complaints not well-founded, with one recommendation declined by the institution.
The OPC found that DND/CAF's collection and use of vaccination status information were authorized under the Privacy Act, directly relating to its operating programs and consistent with the purposes of collection. No evidence of unauthorized disclosure was found, and DND/CAF took reasonable steps to ensure data accuracy, leading to all complaints being deemed not well-founded.
- s.4 Privacy Act
- s.7 Privacy Act
- s.8(1) Privacy Act
- s.8(2)(a) Privacy Act
- s.6(2) Privacy Act
- s.5 Privacy Act
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro