
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada fails to ensure that the information it used to staff a position was accurate
The complainant alleged that Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) used inaccurate personal information about him when staffing a position. ISED acknowledged that its Human Resources officials mistakenly selected the complainant's profile in the MyGCHR system instead of another individual with the same name, leading to the complainant being 'hired' by ISED and 'terminated' from his position at Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC). This error caused the complainant to miss pay periods. The OPC found that ISED did not take all reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy of the personal information, as officials only used first and last names for the search and did not verify with additional identifiers like a Personal Record Identifier (PRI) or date of birth. The complaint was found to be well-founded, but ISED has since implemented a new policy requiring staff to validate identities using multiple data fields.
- 1Whether the information at issue constituted personal information under section 3 of the Privacy Act
- 2Whether ISED took all reasonable steps to ensure that the personal information it used for an administrative purpose was as accurate, up-to-date and complete as possible, as required by subsection 6(2) of the Privacy Act
- Accuracy of personal information: Complaint well-founded
- ISED's actions: Did not take reasonable steps to ensure accuracy
- Policy change: New policy implemented by ISED
Complaint well-founded — corrective measures taken
The OPC found that ISED used inaccurate personal information about the complainant for a staffing process and failed to take reasonable steps to verify identity, such as checking additional identifiers. However, ISED subsequently implemented a policy to prevent similar errors, satisfying the OPC.
ISED created a document to remind staff that they are required to validate the identity of individuals with multiple data fields, such as PRI or date of birth, when using the MyGCHR system.
- s.3 Privacy Act
- s.6(2) Privacy Act
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro