Federal (Canada)Privacy ActNot well-founded

Disclosure of military officer’s personal information for litigation purposes permissible under the Privacy Act

Organization: Department of National Defence and Department of JusticeComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

A military officer complained that the Department of National Defence (DND) inappropriately disclosed his personal medical information to the Department of Justice (DOJ), and that the DOJ inappropriately collected it, for litigation purposes. The complainant had initiated a lawsuit against DND, naming the Attorney General of Canada as respondent. DND disclosed the information, including physical and mental health files, to the DOJ in response to a document collection order for defending against the lawsuit. The OPC found that both the collection by DOJ and disclosure by DND were permissible under the Privacy Act, specifically paragraph 8(2)(d), as the disclosure was to the Attorney General for use in legal proceedings involving the Government of Canada. The OPC also noted that the Act makes no distinction based on the sensitivity of personal information and that doctor-patient confidentiality is not a general privilege in Canadian law. Both complaints were found to be not well-founded.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the collection of the complainant's personal medical information by the DOJ from the DND contravened the Privacy Act
  2. 2Whether the disclosure of the complainant's personal medical information by the DND to the DOJ contravened the Privacy Act
  3. 3Whether the collection by DOJ related directly to an operating program or activity of the institution under s.4 of the Privacy Act
  4. 4Whether the collection by DOJ was permissible under s.5(1) of the Privacy Act given the disclosure under s.8(2)(d)
  5. 5Whether the disclosure by DND was to the Attorney General of Canada under s.8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act
  6. 6Whether the disclosure by DND was for use in legal proceedings involving the Crown in right of Canada or the Government of Canada under s.8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act
  7. 7Whether the sensitivity of medical information impacts the permissibility of disclosure under the Privacy Act
  8. 8Whether doctor-patient confidentiality prevents disclosure under the Privacy Act for litigation purposes
  9. 9Whether the safeguarding measures for the disclosed information were adequate
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Disclosure of medical information: Disclosure by DND permissible
  • Collection of medical information: Collection by DOJ permissible
  • Doctor-patient confidentiality: Not a general privilege in Canadian law
  • Complaint against DND: Not well-founded
  • Complaint against DOJ: Not well-founded
Outcome

Complaints not well-founded

Reasoning

The OPC found that the disclosure and collection met the criteria of paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act, which permits disclosure to the Attorney General for use in legal proceedings involving the Crown, and that the Act does not differentiate based on information sensitivity.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.3 Privacy Act
  • s.4 Privacy Act
  • s.5 Privacy Act
  • s.8(1) Privacy Act
  • s.8(2)(d) Privacy Act
  • s.8(2)(c) Privacy Act

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro