Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded

Canada Revenue Agency gave personal information to a third party without consent

Organization: Canada Revenue AgencyComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

A woman complained that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) disclosed her personal information to a third party without her consent. The complainant, who had not updated her family name in the CRA system, was applying for an adjustment. A CRA employee, attempting to locate her in the system, sent a letter containing the complainant's Social Insurance Number and other personal information to her niece, who shared a similar name and address. The OPC found that this disclosure was due to human error, as the employee failed to follow established procedures for verifying addresses. The CRA acknowledged its mistake and implemented measures to prevent similar incidents. The complaint was found to be well-founded.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the Canada Revenue Agency disclosed personal information without consent
  2. 2Whether the disclosure was due to human error and failure to follow procedures
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Unauthorized disclosure: Complaint well-founded
  • Safeguards: Procedures not followed
  • Corrective action: Measures implemented by institution
Outcome

Complaint well-founded — corrective measures taken

Reasoning

The OPC found that the CRA employee's failure to follow established procedures led to the unauthorized disclosure of personal information. The CRA admitted its error and implemented corrective measures to prevent recurrence, leading to a 'well-founded-resolved' outcome.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Canada Revenue Agency admitted its error and put in place measures to prevent this type of incident from recurring in the future.

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro