Federal (Canada)Privacy ActWell-founded

Canada Border Services Agency over-discloses personal information to the Information Commissioner in relation to an ATIA request

Organization: Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)Complainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

An individual complained that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) over-disclosed their personal information to the Information Commissioner (IC) when seeking approval to decline two Access to Information Act (ATIA) requests. The CBSA provided not only information related to the ATIA requests but also a sensitive labour relations report about the complainant. The CBSA argued the disclosure was a "consistent use" under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act, as the information was collected in the context of workplace conflict and the disclosure was to determine how to handle the complainant's requests for their personal information. The OPC found that while information related to the ATIA requests was a consistent use, the disclosure of the labour relations report was not, as its original purpose (addressing workplace conflict) was distinct from responding to ATIA requests. The OPC concluded that the CBSA contravened section 8 of the Privacy Act and recommended the CBSA develop guidance for consistent use disclosures. The CBSA disagreed with the finding and declined to implement the recommendation, leading to a "well-founded and not resolved" outcome.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the disclosure of personal information to the Information Commissioner was for a "consistent use" under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act
  2. 2Whether information collected for administering ATIA requests can be disclosed to the IC as a consistent use
  3. 3Whether a labour relations report, originally collected for addressing workplace conflict, can be disclosed to the IC as a consistent use in the context of ATIA requests
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Disclosure of ATIA request info: Deemed 'consistent use'
  • Disclosure of labour relations report: Deemed NOT 'consistent use'
  • Privacy Act contravention: CBSA contravened section 8
  • Recommendation implementation: CBSA declined to implement
  • Complaint outcome: Well-founded and not resolved
Outcome

Complaint well-founded and not resolved

Reasoning

The OPC found that the CBSA's disclosure of the labour relations report was not a "consistent use" under paragraph 8(2)(a) of the Privacy Act because the original purpose of collecting that information (addressing workplace conflict) was distinct from the purpose of responding to ATIA requests. The CBSA refused to accept the finding or implement the recommended corrective action.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The OPC recommended that the CBSA develop guidance that includes a clear process for officials to assess the merit of proposed consistent use disclosures of personal information to other government institutions within nine months.

Statutes considered
  • paragraph 8(2)(a) Privacy Act
  • section 8 Privacy Act

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro