← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)Settled Case summary #30
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled Case summary #30: Solicitor’s lien insufficient grounds to deny access to personal information (November 15, 2007)

Organization: A law firmComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

A client sought access to her personal information from her former lawyer. The lawyer refused access, citing outstanding fees and asserting a solicitor's lien on the client's file, believing that providing access could jeopardize payment. The OPC noted that PIPEDA's subsection 9(3) provides an exhaustive list of reasons for refusing access, which does not include a solicitor's lien. Therefore, lawyers must grant access to personal information even if a valid lien exists. The OPC suggested that allowing the individual to view, but not copy, the information could balance the right to access with the lien. The lawyer subsequently provided a complete copy of the file, and the complaint was settled.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether a solicitor's lien is a valid ground to refuse access to personal information under PIPEDA
  2. 2Whether subsection 9(3) of PIPEDA provides an exhaustive list of circumstances for refusing access
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Grounds for refusing access: Solicitor's lien not valid ground for refusal
  • Access to personal information: Access ordered despite lien
  • Resolution of complaint: Complaint settled
Outcome

Complaint settled — lawyer provided access to information

Reasoning

The complaint was settled after the lawyer provided the client with a complete copy of her case file, despite the outstanding account, aligning with the OPC's interpretation that a solicitor's lien is not a valid ground for refusing access under PIPEDA.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The lawyer provided the client with a complete copy of her case file.

Statutes considered
  • s.9(3) PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro