
Settled case summary #29 — A department store
An individual complained that a department store's method of collecting tax exemption information allowed other customers to view her personal data and the data of previous customers. The store used a petition-style form where customers wrote their names, shopping dates, and tax exemption numbers, making this information visible to subsequent customers. The complainant was concerned about the lack of privacy for her personal information. In response to the complaint, the department store first implemented a temporary measure of using a new form where only one customer's information appeared per page. Subsequently, the store reconfigured its cash registers to electronically print a receipt-style form for tax exemptions, which was then completed by the customer and securely stored in the register. This new electronic system prevented customers from viewing each other's personal information. The complainant was satisfied with these changes, and the matter was considered settled.
- 1Whether the department store's method of collecting tax exemption information allowed unauthorized disclosure of personal information to other customers
- 2Whether the department store adequately safeguarded customers' personal information
- Method of collection: Practice changed to protect privacy
- Personal information visibility: System reconfigured to prevent viewing
- Complaint resolution: Complaint settled
Complaint settled — department store revised its process for collecting personal tax exemption information
The complaint was settled because the department store took satisfactory corrective measures during the investigation to address the privacy concerns raised by the complainant.
The department store revised its process for collecting tax exemption information, first by implementing a temporary form where only one customer's information appeared per page, and then by reconfiguring its cash registers to electronically print and securely store individual tax exemption forms.
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro