← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)Settled Case summary #27
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled case summary #27 — A dental clinic

Organization: A dental clinicComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

An individual complained that her dental clinic disclosed information about her overdue account to the person who had referred her to the clinic. The complainant had been in hospital and respite care, missing invoices. The clinic, seeking her whereabouts, disclosed to the referrer that her bill was overdue, the amount owing, and that it would go to collections. The clinic acknowledged this violated its privacy policy, stating it should have only requested contact information. During the investigation, the clinic and complainant reached a monetary settlement, including an apology letter. The OPC and complainant agreed the matter was settled.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the dental clinic disclosed personal information without consent
  2. 2Whether the disclosure of overdue bill details, amount owing, and collection threat to a third party was appropriate
  3. 3Whether the clinic's actions violated its own privacy policy
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Disclosure of personal information: Disclosure violated privacy policy
  • Monetary settlement: Settlement reached between parties
  • Apology letter: Apology provided by institution
  • Complaint resolution: Matter settled by agreement
Outcome

Complaint settled

Reasoning

The complaint was settled through a monetary agreement and an apology letter between the clinic and the complainant, which was satisfactory to both parties and the OPC.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The clinic provided a monetary settlement and a letter of apology to the complainant.

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro