
Settled case summary #23 — A building management firm
A tenant complained that the caretaker of his apartment building disclosed to other tenants that his rent cheque had bounced. The building management firm initially did not take the issue seriously, prompting the tenant to complain to the OPC. While the caretaker and his wife denied the disclosure, another tenant confirmed that the caretaker's wife had indeed shared this information, along with other tenants' rent details. The complainant sought a letter of apology from the building management firm. The firm provided the apology and also reminded the caretaker and his wife about their obligation not to discuss tenants' personal information. The OPC further advised the firm to create a privacy policy in compliance with PIPEDA. The matter was ultimately settled to the satisfaction of both the OPC and the complainant.
- 1Whether a building caretaker disclosed a tenant's personal information without consent
- 2Whether the building management firm adequately protected personal information
- 3Whether the building management firm had appropriate privacy policies in place
- Disclosure of personal information: Disclosure confirmed by third party
- Remedy for disclosure: Apology provided to complainant
- Staff privacy training: Caretakers reminded of privacy obligations
- Privacy policy development: Firm advised to create privacy policy
- Complaint resolution: Matter settled to satisfaction of all parties
Complaint settled
The complaint was resolved through an agreement between the parties, facilitated by the OPC, which included an apology from the firm and a commitment to improve privacy practices.
The building management firm provided a letter of apology to the complainant, reminded its caretaker and his wife not to discuss tenants' personal information, and was advised by the OPC to create a privacy policy.
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro