← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)Settled Case summary #20
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActSettled

Settled case summary #20 — A condominium corporation

Organization: A condominium corporationComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

An individual complained that a condominium corporation disclosed personal information about her dispute with the corporation to all condominium owners. The corporation sent a letter detailing the alleged by-law contravention to all owners, posted it on a bulletin board, and included it in Board meeting minutes. The corporation initially believed only contact information, which it considered publicly available, was disclosed. However, the OPC clarified that the personal information at issue was the fact of the dispute itself. The corporation had disclosed this information without the complainant's consent. The matter was resolved when the condominium corporation sent the complainant a letter of apology.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the fact of an individual's dispute with a condominium corporation constitutes personal information under PIPEDA
  2. 2Whether the condominium corporation disclosed personal information without consent
  3. 3Whether the personal information was publicly available
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Disclosure of personal information: Personal information was disclosed without consent
  • Definition of personal information: Fact of dispute deemed personal information
  • Resolution of complaint: Complaint resolved by apology letter
Outcome

Complaint settled — apology issued

Reasoning

The OPC clarified that the nature of the dispute was personal information, and the corporation had disclosed it without consent. The corporation then issued an apology, leading to a settlement.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The condominium corporation sent the complainant a letter of apology.

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro