
PIPEDA Report of Findings #2017-009: Airline relies on access exemption to refuse traveler’s access to their personal information
A traveler complained that an airline did not provide complete access to his personal information, specifically documents and correspondence related to being denied boarding. The airline relied on exemptions under PIPEDA, arguing that the information was collected to investigate a potential breach of agreement or contravention of law and was disclosed to a government institution for law enforcement purposes. The OPC found that both the collection and disclosure were reasonable under the Act's exemptions, and the airline properly followed the process when a government institution objected to disclosure of the information.
- Whether the collection of personal information without consent was justified under PIPEDA's exemptions.
- Whether the disclosure of personal information to a government institution was justified under PIPEDA's exemptions.
- Whether the airline properly handled the access request when a government institution objected to disclosure.
Complaint not well-founded.
The OPC found that the airline had appropriately relied on exemptions for collecting and disclosing the complainant's personal information to investigate potential breaches of law and that the airline correctly followed the procedure when a government institution objected to the disclosure of certain information.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
- Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.9 PIPEDA
- s. 7(1)(b) PIPEDA
- s. 7(3)(c.1)(ii) PIPEDA
- s. 9(2.1)(a)(i) PIPEDA
- s. 9(2.4)(a) PIPEDA
- s. 9(2.4)(b) PIPEDA
- s. 9(2.4)(c)(i) PIPEDA
- s. 9(3)(c.1) PIPEDA
- s. 9(5) PIPEDA
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

