
PIPEDA Report of Findings #2015-006: Financial institution takes strong remedial measures after insufficient safeguards and unnecessary storage leaves sensitive data vulnerable to breach
An individual complained that an investment brokerage required excessive personal information, including net worth, marital status, and spouse's occupation, to open a self-directed investment account. The complainant argued this was unnecessary given the self-directed nature of the account and that the collection was a condition of service. The brokerage contended that the information was required to comply with regulatory obligations from the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC), the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), and provincial securities legislation. The OPC found that the purposes for collection were properly identified and appropriate, and that the information was necessary to meet the brokerage's legal and regulatory obligations. Therefore, the OPC concluded that the complaint was not well-founded.
- 1Whether the collection of net worth, marital status, and spouse's occupation was necessary for opening a self-directed investment account under Principle 4.4 PIPEDA
- 2Whether the purposes for collecting the personal information were explicitly specified under Principle 4.2 PIPEDA
- 3Whether the purposes for collecting the personal information were legitimate and appropriate under subsection 5(3) PIPEDA
- 4Whether the organization required consent to the collection of information beyond that required for explicitly specified and legitimate purposes as a condition of service under Principle 4.3.3 PIPEDA
- Collection of personal information: Collection found appropriate and necessary
- Condition of service: Collection as condition of service upheld
- Regulatory compliance: Collection justified by regulatory obligations
- Complaint outcome: Complaint not well-founded
Complaint not well-founded
The OPC found that the investment brokerage had legitimate regulatory and legislative obligations (IIROC's KYC rules, PCMLTFA, and provincial securities laws) that necessitated the collection of the disputed personal information, even for self-directed accounts. The collection was deemed necessary and for appropriate, specified purposes.
- s.5(3) PIPEDA
- Principle 4.2 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.3.3 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.4 PIPEDA
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro