BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)/Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act/PIPEDA Findings #2025-002: Investigation and recommendations concerning Google search engine service’s compliance with its obligations under PIPEDA
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of CanadaPersonal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActPIPEDA Findings #2025-002Well-founded
Flag of Canada

PIPEDA Findings #2025-002: Investigation and recommendations concerning Google search engine service’s compliance with its obligations under PIPEDA

Organization: Google
Decision: Aug 27, 2025Published: Aug 27, 2025

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint against Google's search engine service. The complainant alleged that Google was violating PIPEDA by displaying links to old media articles about their arrest and criminal charge. While the OPC found that Google complied with accuracy requirements, it determined that the continued display of these sensitive articles, which caused significant harm to the complainant, outweighed the limited public interest. The OPC recommended Google de-list the articles, but Google refused, stating the matter should be decided by the courts.

  • Whether Google contravened PIPEDA's accuracy requirements by displaying links to outdated articles.
  • Whether Google contravened PIPEDA's "appropriate purposes" provision by displaying sensitive personal information linked to an individual's name.
  • Balancing individual privacy rights against freedom of expression in the context of search engine results.
  • Determining the public interest in accessing historical, sensitive information via search engine results.

Complaint well-founded (unresolved) regarding appropriate purposes, not well-founded regarding accuracy.

The OPC found that while Google accurately reflected the content of the linked articles, the continued display of highly sensitive personal information caused significant harm to the complainant that outweighed the limited public interest, thus contravening PIPEDA's appropriate purposes provision. Google's refusal to de-list the articles means the contravention remains unresolved.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗

Recommended action / remedy

Google was recommended to de-list the specific media articles from search results displayed in response to searches for the complainant's name.

Statutory provisions cited
  • Principle 4.6 PIPEDA
  • subsection 5(3) PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.