
PIPEDA Findings #2022-006: Investigation into Trimac’s use of an audio and video surveillance device in its truck cabins
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) investigated a complaint from a Trimac truck driver concerned about audio and video recording in his truck cabin. The OPC found that while Trimac had legitimate safety and asset protection goals, the continuous audio recording was too intrusive, especially when drivers were off-duty. Trimac was also not initially transparent about using the data for disciplinary purposes, failing to meet consent requirements under PIPEDA. Trimac has since implemented changes, limiting audio recording to on-duty hours and improving data access controls. The OPC found the complaint conditionally resolved regarding the intrusive nature of the recording and resolved regarding the consent issue, accepting Trimac's remedial actions.
- Appropriateness of continuous audio recording in truck cabins, including during off-duty hours.
- Whether Trimac provided adequate information about the use of collected data for disciplinary purposes.
- The proportionality of privacy intrusion versus business benefits.
- The requirement for employee consent for data collection in an employment context.
Complaint conditionally resolved and resolved.
The OPC found that Trimac's continuous audio recording was disproportionately intrusive and that the company failed to initially obtain informed consent for disciplinary uses of the data. Trimac's subsequent implementation of recommendations, such as limiting audio recording and enhancing transparency, led to the conditional resolution and resolution of the complaint.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Trimac was recommended to limit audio recording functionality to on-duty hours and technologically limit access to captured data to those who "need to know." Trimac has implemented these recommendations.
- s. 5(3) PIPEDA
- s. 7.3 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
This summary is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.

