← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)PIPEDA Findings #2020-001
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActNot well-founded

PIPEDA Findings #2020-001: Bank ensures openness and comparable protection for personal information transferred to third party

Organization: TD Canada TrustComplainant: A former employee of TD Canada Trust
Plain-language brief

A former employee of TD Canada Trust complained that TD outsourced fraud claims processing to a third-party service provider in India without obtaining customer consent or offering an opt-out. The complainant also alleged that TD was not sufficiently open about this practice. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) also investigated whether TD maintained accountability by ensuring a comparable level of protection for personal information transferred to the third party. The OPC found that TD was not required to obtain additional consent, as the information was used for the original purpose of fraud claims management for which consent was already obtained. Furthermore, TD was deemed sufficiently open, providing clear information about transfers to foreign jurisdictions in its account agreements and privacy resources. The OPC concluded that TD ensured a comparable level of protection through a robust contract, comprehensive risk assessments, employee controls, cybersecurity measures, and proactive monitoring. Consequently, all aspects of the complaint were found to be not well-founded.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether TD was required to obtain additional consent for transferring personal information to a third-party service provider in India for fraud claims processing (Principle 4.3 PIPEDA)
  2. 2Whether TD was required to offer customers an opt-out for the transfer of personal information to a third-party service provider in India for fraud claims processing
  3. 3Whether TD was sufficiently open about its practice of transferring personal information to a third-party service provider in a foreign jurisdiction for processing (Principle 4.8 PIPEDA)
  4. 4Whether TD ensured a comparable level of protection for personal information processed by the third-party service provider in India (Principle 4.1.3 PIPEDA)
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Consent for outsourcing: No additional consent required
  • Openness of practices: Openness deemed sufficient
  • Accountability for transfers: Comparable protection ensured
Outcome

Complaint not well-founded

Reasoning

The OPC found that TD had obtained consent for the original purpose of fraud claims management, was sufficiently open about its practices, and maintained accountability through contractual and other measures ensuring comparable protection for personal information.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • Principle 4.1.3 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.4 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.5 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.7 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.7.1 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.7.2 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.7.3 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.8 PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro