← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)PIPEDA Findings #2019-003
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActWell-founded & resolved

PIPEDA Findings #2019-003: Investigation into authentication and transfer practices used during Loblaw gift card offering

Organization: Loblaw Companies Ltd.Complainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Loblaw collected more personal information than necessary for its $25 gift card program and was concerned about data transfers to a US-based third party. Loblaw requested ID (utility bill or driver's license) from some registrants to verify eligibility and prevent fraud, but initially failed to specify that only name and address were needed and other information could be redacted. The OPC found that Loblaw initially over-collected information under Principle 4.4, but this issue was resolved when Loblaw clarified its requirements. Regarding the cross-border transfer of data to a US Program Administrator, the OPC found that Loblaw had sufficient contractual safeguards in place to ensure a comparable level of protection (Principle 4.1.3) and was transparent about these transfers (Principle 4.8). No additional consent was required for the transfer of name and address information, as it was for the original purpose. The complaint was found well-founded and resolved for over-collection, and not well-founded for the data transfer issues.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether Loblaw collected more personal information than necessary for the Loblaw Card Program (Principle 4.4)
  2. 2Whether Loblaw ensured a comparable level of protection for personal information transferred to a third party for processing (Principle 4.1.3)
  3. 3Whether Loblaw was required to obtain additional consent for the transfer of personal information for processing (Principle 4.3)
  4. 4Whether Loblaw was sufficiently open and transparent about its cross-border data transfers (Principle 4.8)
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Over-collection of personal information: Initially over-collected, issue resolved
  • Cross-border data transfer safeguards: Sufficient contractual safeguards in place
  • Transparency of data transfer: Transparent about transfers
  • Consent for data transfer: No additional consent required
Outcome

Complaint well-founded and resolved in part, not well-founded in part

Reasoning

Loblaw initially over-collected personal information by not clearly stating that ID could be redacted, but rectified this issue during the investigation. Its data transfer practices to a US third party were found to have comparable protections and were transparent.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

Loblaw clarified its ID collection requirements to specify that only name and address were needed and other information could be redacted, resolving the over-collection issue.

Statutes considered
  • Principle 4.1.3 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.4 PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.8 PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro