BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)/Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act/PIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006: Directory company lacked consent to publish complainant's personal information
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of CanadaPersonal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActPIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006Well-founded & conditionally resolved
Flag of Canada

PIPEDA Case Summary #2019-006: Directory company lacked consent to publish complainant's personal information

Organization: Grey House Publishing Canada
Decision: Mar 28, 2019Published: Mar 28, 2019

The complainant alleged that Grey House Publishing Canada (Grey House) collected, used, and disclosed his personal information without his knowledge or consent. Grey House collected the complainant's contact information from a non-profit association's webpage and included it in its print directory and database. Grey House then sold an email distribution list containing this information to Economic and Social Development Canada (ESDC), which used it to send emails promoting a federal program. The OPC found that Grey House contravened PIPEDA by collecting and using the complainant's personal information without adequate consent, as the information was not considered business contact information and did not fall under the exceptions for publicly available information. The OPC also found that Grey House contravened PIPEDA's openness principle by having an inadequate privacy statement.

  • Whether the complainant's contact information constituted personal information or business contact information under PIPEDA
  • Whether Grey House was conducting commercial activity under PIPEDA
  • Whether Grey House obtained adequate consent to collect and use the complainant's personal information
  • Whether Grey House's privacy statement adequately reflected its practices

Complaint well-founded; privacy practices required correction.

The OPC determined that the complainant's information was personal information collected in the course of commercial activity. Grey House failed to obtain adequate consent for its collection and use, and its privacy statement was deficient. However, Grey House removed the complainant's information and agreed to revise its privacy statement.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗

Recommended action / remedy

Grey House Publishing Canada removed the complainant's information from its database and agreed to revise its privacy statement to better reflect its privacy practices.

Statutory provisions cited
  • s. 2(1) PIPEDA
  • s. 4.01 PIPEDA
  • s. 4.1(a) PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
  • s. 7(1)(d) PIPEDA
  • s. 7(2)(c.1) PIPEDA
  • s. 7(3)(h.1) PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.8.1 PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.