← Back to catalogue/Federal (Canada)Discontinued Case Summary #2014-004
Federal (Canada)Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents ActDiscontinued

Discontinued Case Summary #2014-004: Complaint discontinued on the basis of bad faith as complainant had released the retailer from liability

Organization: A retailerComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

An individual filed a complaint against a retailer, alleging a failure to provide access to personal information under PIPEDA. This complaint arose after the complainant and the retailer had settled a small claims court dispute. As part of that settlement, the complainant had signed a mutual release, receiving financial compensation in exchange for releasing the retailer from all claims and complaints, including those arising under statute, related to events prior to the release date. The OPC found that the complaint was made in bad faith, given the existence of this mutual release. Consequently, the investigation was discontinued under paragraph 12.2(1)(b) of PIPEDA.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the complaint was made in bad faith under paragraph 12.2(1)(b) of PIPEDA
  2. 2Whether a mutual release agreement impacts the validity of a subsequent privacy complaint
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Bad faith complaint: Complaint discontinued
  • Mutual release: Release considered binding
  • Access to personal information: No finding made
Outcome

Investigation discontinued due to bad faith

Reasoning

The OPC discontinued the investigation because the complainant had signed a mutual release, agreeing to release the retailer from all claims and complaints, including statutory ones, in exchange for financial compensation, thus rendering the subsequent privacy complaint in bad faith.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • subsection 8(3) PIPEDA
  • Principle 4.9 PIPEDA
  • paragraph 12.2(1)(b) PIPEDA

This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro